We performed a comparison between Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."We have 20,000 endpoints in our organization. It's very critical to monitor each and every device with any of our solutions. By deploying Cybereason, it collects all the information from every computer and it will feed it to the AI engine and do a malware check. It's very clear cut and we save a lot of time. It detects the problem very quickly and we can prevent an issue before it occurs."
"Many different playbooks are available and can be customized."
"The solution is very reliable."
"It was useful as a ticketing tool."
"Palo Alto is easy to use."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to configure."
"Palo Alto has gotten the investigators more presence to actually go in the report because being that the platform will email the investigator that it's been assigned to, now the investigators will jump in there and start going through the review process a lot quicker."
"It’s easy to install."
"The strengths of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR stem from the fact that it provides functionalities related to patching and URL blocking...It is a scalable solution."
"It's all on the analysis part. They currently support from email only. If we have a problem with Cybereason like high memory utilization, for example, we send an email to their team and they respond when they see it, but there is no on-call support. They don't offer the ability to call them."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the Panorama feature. We had to turn it off because it was not working properly."
"The formats are not compatible, are readily not available, and are not readable."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the look, feel, and management of the cloud console. Additionally, the user could be more easily integrated."
"The dashboard performance could be improved."
"When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR lacks to offer SIEM functionalities currently."
"There is room for improvement in terms of the pricing model."
"The tool’s multi-tenancy feature must be improved."
More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 42 reviews. Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] writes "Detects a problem very quickly and enables us to prevent an issue before it occurs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Cortex XSIAM, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Swimlane.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.