We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPMI would be the academy courses, specifically the Product Development Network (PDN). Additionally, our organization has a dedicated Customer Engagement Team that we work closely with to achieve our goals."
"The product helps you to build faster."
"Fast prototyping."
"This is a customizable product."
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is step-by-step voice guidance that converts your problem statement into different diagrams and then implements the process."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother."
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.