We performed a comparison between Camunda and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.