We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"By moving to Datadog, we did not need to manage our own monitoring infrastructure anymore."
"The management of SLOs and their related burn-rate monitors have allowed us to onboard teams to on-call fast."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the APM."
"It helps us better manage our logs."
"The CCM, Workflows, Logs, APM, and RUM are all useful aspects of the solution."
"It is easy to navigate the menu and create tests."
"The most useful feature is the APM."
"The most valuable aspect is for us to have everything in one place."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"ECS could be improved by including more tutorials for beginners to reduce the barriers to entry."
"I'm not sure what kind of features are in the roadmap right now, but I encourage the development of features for defining your organization, and allowing the visibility of what kind of metrics you can get. Those features would be really useful for us."
"There is occasional UI slowness and bugs."
"It can have a more modernized pricing mechanism. We're actually working with them to figure out how to become more modular and have a better and more modernized pricing mechanism. The issue with Datadog is that you have to buy the whole suite of different products, and you kind of get stuck in the old utilization of 40% of their suite. Most organizations today break down between application development, networking, and security. Therefore, there should be a way to break down different modules into just app dev, infosec, networking, etc. Customers have various needs across their business lines, and sometimes, they're just not willing to have tools that they're not using 100%. AppDynamics is probably a little bit better in terms of being modular."
"The ability to find what you are looking for when starting out could be improved."
"I would like better navigability across pages."
"I think better access to their engineers when we have a problem could be better."
"The ease of implementation needs improvement."
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.