We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and FME based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"It has been a stable product."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."
"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."
"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."
"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."
"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."
"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."
"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."
"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."
"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while FME is ranked 24th in Data Integration with 5 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while FME is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FME writes "Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory, whereas FME is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Alteryx Designer, Talend Open Studio, SSIS and JumpMind SymmetricDS. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. FME report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
