We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The most valuable features in Active Directory are the password writeback product and the MDM technology."
"It's pretty easy to implement."
"The tool's most valuable feature is conditional access."
"Multi-factor authentication (MFA) has improved our customers' security posture. Multi-factor authentication has two layers of authentication, which helps in case you input your credentials into a phishing website and then it has access to your credentials. So if they use your credentials, then you have proof on your phone that was sent to the end user."
"Azure Active Directory has useful policy assigning and management."
"The tool's most valuable feature is auto logs. It helps with user activity and monitoring. It also assists us with GLBA policies and procedures. Microsoft Entra ID gives a 360 view of what the user has access to, what applications are available to them, when they are logging in and out, etc. It makes knowing what is happening to our tenants incredibly powerful."
"Syncing with our on-prem Active Directory is valuable because we do not have to keep multiple identities for each of our staff members. We can easily evaluate login risks and provide access for SSO via 365 into applications, such as Salesforce, and other things that we run our business on."
"The most valuable feature is Identity and Access Management. As an IT administrator, this feature allows me to manage access for users and groups."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The solution is simple to use."
"In terms of stability, sometimes the more applications you integrate, the more it becomes a little bit unstable."
"Better deployment management and visibility functionality would be helpful."
"An area where there is room for improvement is the ease of use of the dashboards."
"Azure AD does not support legacy authentication protocols, such as NTLM or Kerberos."
"I would like to see improvements made when it comes to viewing audit logs, sign-in logs, and resource tags."
"The product needs to improve its support."
"The downside of using a single password to access the entire system is that if those credentials are compromised, the hacker will have full access."
"The solution could be improved when it comes to monitoring and logging as these are the most critical areas in case something was to go wrong."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO). Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Yubico YubiKey and Cisco Duo, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Auth0.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.