We performed a comparison between Keeper and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Stronger passwords are being used across the board in our organization."
"Enables IT department to force very complex passwords for certain users."
"We can access our sign-ins and passwords on up to five devices per user. This means I can access a given site and my login and password for that site from my home and office computers as well as my phone and iPad."
"Keeper has strong security features."
"Password sharing and SSO. These features almost become a necessity to make sure that company data is safe and reduce the possibility of data breach."
"I like a couple of things about this solution. Being able to share passwords with other people is valuable. You can see if the information is out on the dark web and whether you have weak passwords and the last time they were changed. You could also have the 2FA or MFA codes embedded in the application so that you don't have to use your phone or any other 2FA device, which is something very important."
"It is very easy to install and setup."
"Possibility to login using the fingerprint sensor on Android/iPhone."
"Microsoft Azure AD is easy to install and is a stable solution."
"The most important things of Azure Active Directory are the security and the facility to manage all the services and users. It is very easy to manage users and assign roles, permissions, and access. At the same time, it is a very secure environment. Microsoft takes security very seriously. They take care of all the security and all the factors to prevent any kind of data or information compromise."
"The solution allows users to authenticate from home, and the Office 360 integration is advantageous."
"The best thing about Microsoft Entra ID is the ease of setup."
"I like Azure AD's conditional access policies. Microsoft Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, improving the overall user experience."
"Overall, I think the support and the pictorial format of this web portal are very good."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."
"Using [Azure AD's] passwordless technology, you're not even using a password anymore. You're basically just creating a logon request without actually sending or typing or storing the password. This is awesome for any user, regardless of whether you're a factory worker or a CFO. It's secure and super-simple."
"I would like to see a way to store files and photos in the next update. If it already does this, I have yet to explore it."
"The technical support has no experience."
"The stability of the solution can be improved."
"Its aesthetic needs improvement."
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"They could possibly add a pre-designed contact feature that would work similar to a cell phone contact feature."
"Possible offline access to passwords. Therefore, when internet access is unavailable, I can still access my vault."
"The password rotation feature could be improved."
"We have a lot of freedom in using the Group Policy Objects and, although Group Policy Objects are part of Azure Active Directory, there are still a lot of things that can be improved, such as providing local admin rights to a user. There are various, easy ways that I can do that in the on-premises version, but in the cloud version, it is a bit difficult. You have to create a bunch of policies to make it work."
"Its price should be improved. It is very expensive for Turkish people."
"One thing that they need to improve is the cost."
"Microsoft services and most familiar third-party applications are currently supported, but we can't find many other platforms that integrate with Office 365 or Azure Active Directory. Microsoft should develop connectors for different applications and collaborate more with other vendors to cover a broader range of applications."
"Microsoft Entra ID should improve workload identities. It should set conditional access."
"If any service is down, it can affect a whole region. We would need to wait on a ticket and get word from Microsoft to understand the issues. If it takes longer to resolve the issue on Microsoft's side, all we can do is wait for them to fix it."
"Microsoft has so many different requirements and priorities that sometimes they don't invest all their energy into the products that you have expectations to investigate."
"Allowing for more customization would be very useful. There is a limited metadata capability. When you look at a user, there are only six pieces of information you can see, but organizations are way more complex, so having that metadata available and being able to use that for dynamic user groups and other policies would be very helpful."
Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews. Keeper is rated 9.2, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Yubico YubiKey and Cisco Duo. See our Keeper vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
