We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."
"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed."
"It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to."
"It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs."
"We use technical support all the time. We would be lost without them. They're fantastic. Really good job. We're able to reach the right person to help us out right away."
"Easy configuration and integration with SAP."
"CA Workload Automation AutoSys Edition is one of the most powerful schedulers that you have on the open systems, or going between Window servers; to be able to schedule and take advantage of the different powers that the automation has with it."
"The features that I have found most valuable with AutoSys are that it is scalable, easy to use, fast, and always available. That's very important because if it's not steady then it's a real problem. So, at this point, we are satisfied with it."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"An area for improvement in AutoSys Workload Automation is that it lacks advanced features or advanced built-in functionalities found in competitors, for example, an advanced workflow feature. Even the handling or notification from AutoSys Workload Automation isn't the best in the industry. Other products have very good workflow-related functionalities such as ActiveBatch that's missing in AutoSys Workload Automation, so I wish the tool had those features."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"SQL server clustering is not supported."
"The lack of documentation, that is an issue. When we do need to bring it down for maintenance, it is always a scary moment for us because we have never had it crash."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."
"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."
"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"The price could be improved."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 40 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.