Atos DirX Directory vs PingID comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atos Logo
68 views|43 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Ping Identity Logo
2,174 views|1,788 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atos DirX Directory and PingID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"DirX Directory is the best feature of the product: a very fast, stable LDAP directory.""The most valuable feature is its knowledge.""The role and attribute-based access control has been greatly improved.""The solution offers high performance."

More Atos DirX Directory Pros →

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower.""The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering.""This is a user-friendly solution.""I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications.""I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use.""The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in.""What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions.""It's pretty stable as a product."

More PingID Pros →

Cons
"An overall modernization of the product is required in order to keep up with newer products.""Needs more available consultants and implementation partners.""The Self-Service Portal is old school and it lacks easy accessibility for users.""The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release.""The user interface could be more convenient for people that don't know the tool too intensively."

More Atos DirX Directory Cons →

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings.""PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users.""It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution.""The product is not customizable.""I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved.""If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base.""They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement.""PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."

More PingID Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."
  • "PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."
  • "The product is costly."
  • "The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
  • More PingID Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its knowledge.
    Top Answer:The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release.
    Top Answer:The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
    Top Answer:The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
    Ranking
    Views
    68
    Comparisons
    43
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    8.0
    7th
    Views
    2,174
    Comparisons
    1,788
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    573
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DirX Directory
    Ping Identity
    Learn More
    Overview

    DirX Directory is a standards-compliant, high-performance, highly available, reliable and secure Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and X.500 directory server. It offers unlimited scalability with outstanding read and write performance.

    IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
    Sample Customers
    National Savings and Investments, Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
    Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Construction Company9%
    Insurance Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company44%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Atos DirX Directory is ranked 19th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews while PingID is ranked 7th in Authentication Systems with 14 reviews. Atos DirX Directory is rated 6.8, while PingID is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atos DirX Directory writes "An identity management system with valuable knowledge". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingID writes " A robust cloud-based multi-factor solution with a good customer support team". Atos DirX Directory is most compared with One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas PingID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, PingFederate, SailPoint IdentityIQ and RSA SecurID.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.