We performed a comparison between Ataccama ONE Platform, Microsoft MDS, and SAP Master Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, TIBCO and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software."The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."
"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."
"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."
"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."
"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."
"The backup and restore functionality are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"Technical support is very good."
"Enables non-technical people to directly interact with the BI system."
"The tool is easy to use."
"One of the main features I have found useful is the integration with Azure active directory."
"The most valuable feature is the administration console."
"It is very easy to deploy and provision a machine."
"The best thing about it is that it comes with the Microsoft package."
"A good solution for large enterprises."
"SAP Master Data Governance integrates well."
"Useful for building master data."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of SAP Master Data Governance is very easy."
"I am satisfied with the solution's customer service."
"The data capturing and data governance features are valuable."
"This is an all-around good product."
"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."
"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."
"Data movement is a pain."
"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."
"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."
"I do not like using Silverlight and Internet Explorer. The new 2019 version gets rid of that, which is one of the reasons why we are looking to switch."
"In the next version, I would like to see integration with Azure."
"The solution could be better integrated into Microsoft's other products."
"The Microsoft license cost could be lower."
"Microsoft MDS isn't getting strong support because Microsoft is focusing more on cloud solutions."
"There are occasions when the solution maintains SD and we get duplications of MDS."
"The stability could be improved."
"Microsoft MDS' language should be simple so everyone can use it easily."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The documentation provided for the MDG extensions by Utopia could be improved."
"The user interface is not user-friendly."
"The UI could improve by being more neat and clean. Sometimes users find it difficult to use it."
"Lacks some features that are available in other solutions."
"The solution lacks some flexibility."