Appvance IQ vs BrowserStack comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Appvance Logo
597 views|366 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
BrowserStack Logo
8,712 views|6,797 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Appvance IQ and BrowserStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This solution costs less than competing products."
  • "The price is fine."
  • "There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."
  • "BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."
  • "The price of BrowserStack is high."
  • "Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."
  • "My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."
  • "As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."
  • More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.
    Top Answer:My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.
    Top Answer:I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Ranking
    28th
    Views
    597
    Comparisons
    366
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    6,797
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 38% of the time.
    Selenium HQ logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Automaton logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    ReadyAPI logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    LambdaTest logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Sauce Labs logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Perfecto logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    CrossBrowserTesting logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Appvance
    Learn More
    Overview

    Appvance.ai is the leader in AI-driven testing, which is revolutionizing how software testing is performed. The company’s premier product is Appvance IQ™, the world’s first AI-driven, unified test automation system. AIQ empowers enterprises to improve the quality, performance and security of their apps, while transforming the efficiency and output of their testing teams.

    Appvance IQ was launched in late 2017, helping Appvance.ai to become among the fastest growing test automation companies in the world, and the leader in the new category of AI driven testing.

    BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.
    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Bell Canada, CBS, UBC, PepsiCo, 7-11, BenefitVision, Kabbage, Catalent Pharmaceuticals, McKesson, Veritas, Cherwell, QAT Global, Sony, SiriusXM, CoPart, Auto Parts Alliance, PPD
    Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company55%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Appvance IQ is ranked 28th in Functional Testing Tools while BrowserStack is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews. Appvance IQ is rated 8.0, while BrowserStack is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appvance IQ writes "Network Emulation allows for performance testing of geographically-distributed users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". Appvance IQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Automaton, SmartBear TestComplete and ReadyAPI, whereas BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, CrossBrowserTesting and Tricentis Tosca.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.