Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,982 views|5,152 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
770 views|653 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,971 views|4,883 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier, Microsoft Azure Block Storage, and Microsoft Azure File Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution.""AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR).""Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable and scalable solution.""We use the solution for migration.""We save money with the product.""The solution’s storage management is good and dynamic. The product is highly stable. The solution is highly scalable. The customer service and support is good. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend the solution.""The solution is stable.""AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"Microsoft is currently updating a few features, such as object sizes and tiering, which were not available previously.""Storing and then retrieving data are the most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Block Storage.""Azure Block Storage has very good integration with the Microsoft suite, which helps a lot when creating a digital workspace.""The data lake is invaluable. We also use Microsoft SQL in terms of structuring the data and getting into a position where it could be useful to support reporting. We Databricks for data science. We incorporated Databricks with that as well.""The most valuable features of this solution are the ease with which you connect and use it.""Azure Block Storage lets you customize code you can use on that endpoint. If you want to write a logic for something, Azure Function can be used to deploy that application.""We can use Azure Block Storage for some of our bigger files.""The solution is easy to purchase and is a Microsoft product, making procurement straightforward."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pros →

"The initial setup is fairly easy.""First of all, the solution is very secure. Secondly, the solution is very fast. It is reliable and available all the time.""This solution supports all file formats.""The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place.""The product can integrate with all platforms. My team also does data visualization, and Power BI can directly connect with those nodes. We can very conveniently connect with multiple tools for our database. The benefit here is that by utilizing the same storage application, my application is linked with their application through the same server. This setup provides real analytics and data for a holistic purpose, which is advantageous.""The product is a reliable cloud solution.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability.""The solution can scale to fit any requirement."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

Cons
"There is room for improvement in handling GDPR compliance better. GDPR is about personal data protection and retention. It would be great if S3 Glacier could handle compliance items related to this, especially with upcoming legislation like the California law, which restricts data storage time and allows users to request data deletion.""They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price.""Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud.""The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low.""The product needs to improve cloud security.""I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features.""The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"There have been problems with integration, but it's getting better.""The stability of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is good but could improve.""Some big customers have experienced some problems with the stability of the Azure cloud.""I want to see my region added to the data center. I'm in Africa, and if a data center is specifically added under Central Africa, that will reduce data latency when accessing data.""Uploading of data could be improved. Currently, the only way you can upload your data is by using their storage explorer. You need to use a command line to do that. Then, maybe you can go online and you can use their explorer to check to see if it's there. If they had a third-party application to handle the upload, it would be better. Many people aren't familiar with command lines for uploading data. It makes it more difficult for many users.""The solution needs a direct connection to visualization.""The implementation can be quite technical.""The performance could be improved, but all the services in the cloud are improved every week."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Cons →

"Microsoft Azure File Storage should improve its pricing.""The tool needs to add more controls and enhance Power BI. For instance, I'm just suggesting the visualization layer. Power BI can increase visualization as much as possible, and the product can add more controls to the data flows.""It's not very intuitive.""Licensing costs are expensive.""It’s a challenge to find the right support person.""The solution should support all the legacy storage systems.""In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity.""Microsoft Azure File Storage needs more integrations. In the future, I also want to see GRC added to the portal. If you enroll or sign up for Azure services, your country may not have GRC available in the portal, so you may have to choose a strange country, for example, Kenya, to activate credit."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is affordable, and we only pay for what we use."
  • "For the first 50DB, they cost around $50. It's an open solution for everybody. Anybody can go to the Microsoft website and they can get the pricing for it. But the first 50GB of data is a default rate and then it increases for the next 500GB or something like that. It is a pay as you go solution. The more you use, the more you pay. That's normally how you pay for any cloud solutions."
  • "In terms of pricing, Azure is quite cheaper than AWS. However, I have recently read that Oracle Cloud Generation 2 storage is quite cheaper than Azure. I haven't used it yet. We need to look at a customer's requirements, and, based on that, we can suggest the storage. You can save at least 20% with Azure as compared to AWS, which is quite costly."
  • "Azure Block Storage is higher priced than its competitors."
  • "We pay around $300 to $400 a month for some scenarios where consumption is limited. However, going forward, we're seeing the likelihood of the cost coming to around $2,000 as consumption rises."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage could be less expensive."
  • "The cost is very low. The cost is something like $0.01 to $0.50 per gig. It's pay per use. We have a yearly license."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is less expensive than other solutions on the market, such as Cloud Storage from GCP."
  • More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution to develop SaaS platforms on Azure. We utilize various Microsoft components like block storage and… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Azure Block Storage is expensive. Its licensing costs are monthly.
    Top Answer:Microsoft Azure Block Storage should improve its stability.
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,982
    Comparisons
    5,152
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    770
    Comparisons
    653
    Reviews
    44
    Average Words per Review
    445
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    5,971
    Comparisons
    4,883
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    MS Azure Block Storage
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications

    Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
    Sample Customers
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Mazda, BlinkBox, Rakuten Showtime, Xbox One, Serko, ChronoDrive
    Talon, Camden
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization30%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Retailer13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Construction Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Public Cloud Storage Services
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.