Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Block Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
447 views|315 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,982 views|5,152 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
770 views|653 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), Amazon S3 Glacier, and Microsoft Azure Block Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Amazon EBS are the ease of mounting any file system and good for block storage. We can use secondary storage for our difficult instances and it performs well.""The most valuable feature is its scalability. I can easily scale the block from terabytes to gigabytes.""One of the most valuable was snapshots. There were scenarios in which the whole EC2 crashed, or we were unable to use it for some time, but the data on the mounted volumes were crucial to us. So, at that time, snapshots were very helpful.""When it comes to valuable features, ease of use would be number one.""The tool has different types of volumes, like SSD and HDD.""The product's initial setup phase was easy to manage.""The most valuable feature of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is its scalability.""The product comes with multiple central port installations like gp2 and gp3."

More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pros →

"The product is easy to use.""The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally.""The tool is simple to use and not very expensive.""It is a very comprehensive tool.""The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier.""The reliability of storage is the main benefit.""Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services.""We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"The initial setup is very simple and straightforward.""RBAC, access control, soft delete, hard delete, and cool and hot storage tiers are some of the features I have found valuable in Azure Block storage.""We can use Azure Block Storage for some of our bigger files.""This is a very stable solution.""The most important reason we use Azure Block Storage is the ability to store large files. When we were building the solution, we knew we needed to store images and video files that are 100 MBs or more. The second thing is speed when dealing with such large file sizes.""It has easy versioning. The versioning is amenable to any changes. It also has great security. It can only be accessed through an API, and only the requested users can access it. It is optimized for data lakes and comprehensive data management.""It can scale.""It can be deployed independently and supports every kind of deployment."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pros →

Cons
"Amazon EBS performs well but it could improve.""There is room for improvement in terms of file storage. Recently, we had a scenario in which, in a file share, we had increased the IOPS capacity; this was for the production environment.""It would be good if the solution added a button to increase the size and make the EC2 machine recognize the increased capacity of the EBS.""In Amazon EBS, it is difficult to reduce the space chosen by the customer. The cost increases the moment the size of the storage increases, and I will have to pay for two TB of the tool instead of one TB.""It is hard to access EBS volumes in different Availability Zones (AZs) because most EBS volumes are created in a single AZ.""It would be better to analyze and find a way to merge both the file systems of Linux and Windows.""The setup could be easier.""The cost of using EBS is high compared to other cloud vendors such as Tencent Cloud or CARI Cloud. Some costs are generated immediately and some are likely to increase."

More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Cons →

"The user experience must be improved.""They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price.""Amazon S3 Glacier could be more secure.""Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out.""I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the market.""Technical support needs improvement. Previously, even though we had premium and enterprise support, the response time would be quicker if we ran into issues, but now it is slowed down. The analytical dashboard feature, like the CloudOps dashboard, should be included in the next release of the Amazon S3 Glacier.""The technical support has room for improvement.""The product’s pricing must be improved."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"We need to do versioning each and every time, that is, check-in and check-out. If a person forgets to do that, then there could be an issue in the replacement of that particular object in the storage. It will be great if it can be automatically managed.""The solution could have better archival policies and localization of data.""The solution needs a direct connection to visualization.""The initial setup of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is more complex than Google Drive, but it is still not too difficult.""The support response time could be quicker.""The solution's downside is related to its documentation, which I believe can be difficult to navigate because it is hidden between or within other pages of the product's manual.""One of the biggest challenges on Azure infrastructure is that sometimes we don't get what we want. Either we have to wait for it or contact support because something is not working for us... It's the system availability that is the difficult point.""The integrations right now are limited, however, we are hopeful this will improve as the cloud continues to develop."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "What I want Amazon to do is lower the price."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high, I rate the price a seven."
  • "The product is low-priced than other solutions."
  • "It is a cost-effective solution."
  • "You need to pay additional costs for support."
  • "The pricing models may be for general purposes, such as Amazon EBS Provisioned IOPS Volume or Amazon EBS Cold HDD Volumes."
  • "The solution is quite costly."
  • More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is affordable, and we only pay for what we use."
  • "For the first 50DB, they cost around $50. It's an open solution for everybody. Anybody can go to the Microsoft website and they can get the pricing for it. But the first 50GB of data is a default rate and then it increases for the next 500GB or something like that. It is a pay as you go solution. The more you use, the more you pay. That's normally how you pay for any cloud solutions."
  • "In terms of pricing, Azure is quite cheaper than AWS. However, I have recently read that Oracle Cloud Generation 2 storage is quite cheaper than Azure. I haven't used it yet. We need to look at a customer's requirements, and, based on that, we can suggest the storage. You can save at least 20% with Azure as compared to AWS, which is quite costly."
  • "Azure Block Storage is higher priced than its competitors."
  • "We pay around $300 to $400 a month for some scenarios where consumption is limited. However, going forward, we're seeing the likelihood of the cost coming to around $2,000 as consumption rises."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage could be less expensive."
  • "The cost is very low. The cost is something like $0.01 to $0.50 per gig. It's pay per use. We have a yearly license."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is less expensive than other solutions on the market, such as Cloud Storage from GCP."
  • More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage… more »
    Top Answer:The durability and snapshot capabilities are good.
    Top Answer:The solution is quite costly. There was an instance when we were not using 50 volumes. They were available and were… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution for storage. We use it for application data storage and retrieval and for data backup. It has various… more »
    Top Answer:The product’s security features are valuable.
    Top Answer:The user interface is very difficult. It is not user-friendly. We need time to understand the product and create a… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 52 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    315
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    5,982
    Comparisons
    5,152
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    770
    Comparisons
    653
    Reviews
    44
    Average Words per Review
    445
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    MS Azure Block Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) provides persistent block level storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud.  Each Amazon EBS volume is automatically replicated within its Availability Zone to protect you from component failure, offering high availability and durability. Amazon EBS volumes offer the consistent and low-latency performance needed to run your workloads. With Amazon EBS, you can scale your usage up or down within minutes – all while paying a low price for only what you provision.

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications

    Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.

    Sample Customers
    Bazaar Voice, Crowd Strike, Adobe, Gamevil, Hess, CopperEgg, TotalJobs Group, SuperCell, Dropcam, Unilever
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Mazda, BlinkBox, Rakuten Showtime, Xbox One, Serko, ChronoDrive
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization47%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Insurance Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Retailer13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise54%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Storage
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.