Amazon API Gateway vs webMethods API Portal comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
26,199 views|22,937 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Software AG Logo
439 views|330 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and webMethods API Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management.
To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is stable.""t is easy for integrations if it is deployed in AWS Services.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""It allows us to expose our APIs and provides tools for managing them.""The initial setup is pretty easy. Deployment only takes five minutes.""The product is really good when it comes to API lifecycle management, and it is not just something that includes the balancing part or the security aspect but also the routing and the fallback mechanism.""The best thing about Amazon API Gateway is that it can authenticate and authorize requests without going to our back end.""Amazon API Gateway can integrate with ECS and Lambda."

More Amazon API Gateway Pros →

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair.""webMethods API Portal is overall very valuable. It is now a comprehensive API catalogue that serves various purposes, including API assessment and evaluation.""It is good for communicating between the systems and for publishing and subscribing. We can easily retrieve data. It is good in terms of troubleshooting and other things."

More webMethods API Portal Pros →

Cons
"It would be useful to have a more complete development environment for the developer, with different integrative capabilities to manage all the life cycles for the API. I think the full version formula for that is really useful. They should improve the development environment for easier integration.""The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Amazon API Gateway can improve the user interface in some areas it could be more polished.""I am not completely satisfied with Technical Support.""The integration could be improved.""Amazon API Gateway is not as complete as Apigee and needs to be improved by adding more features to become a more robust application.""Currently, I'm not facing any issues with Amazon API Gateway, which satisfies my requirements. I'm pretty happy with what Amazon API Gateway offers, but as its pricing is on the higher side, that's one area for improvement in the solution. What I'd like to see in the next release of Amazon API Gateway is an improvement in the status checks you get from the monitoring feature of the solution. Currently, you get the number of requests received, the number of reports, etc., but if there are more details than what's given by Amazon API Gateway, that will improve the solution.""The pricing could be improved. In cases where customers require real-time sync or real-time calling groups with IoT, the volume of data and time lag become a concern."

More Amazon API Gateway Cons →

"The on-premises setup can be difficult.""The improvement needed is related to the model's position. As of now, it seems to be more of a conceptual idea rather than a widely implemented solution. For how long""Some of the things that we use cannot be done in this solution. For these things, we have to either use a Java service or a util service. There is no predefined or existing service that we can use. So, we have to work on the util service and write on top of it. Its price can also be better. It is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

More webMethods API Portal Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a pay-per-use service, where you only pay for what you use."
  • "Fees are volume-based."
  • "There are no licensing fees."
  • "I am satisfied with the price."
  • "There is an annual licensing cost to use Amazon API Gateway."
  • "Amazon API Gateway has various pricing plans, but I cannot give the exact cost, though I can say that it's expensive. On a scale of one to five, I'd rate the pricing for Amazon API Gateway as two, as the solution is one of the most expensive products in the market for API management."
  • "We use all open-source technology."
  • "Since it's a serverless solution, Amazon API Gateway is not so expensive."
  • More Amazon API Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."
  • "I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."
  • More webMethods API Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring… more »
    Top Answer:I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including… more »
    Top Answer:If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and… more »
    Top Answer:webMethods API Portal is overall very valuable. It is now a comprehensive API catalogue that serves various purposes, including API assessment and evaluation.
    Top Answer:I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not cheap.
    Top Answer:The improvement needed is related to the model's position. As of now, it seems to be more of a conceptual idea rather than a widely implemented solution. Monetization is currently on the rise, driven… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    26,199
    Comparisons
    22,937
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    429
    Rating
    8.5
    23rd
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    439
    Comparisons
    330
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    647
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create an API that acts as a "front door" for applications to access data, business logic, or functionality from your back-end services, such as workloads running on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), code running on AWS Lambda, or any Web application.

    Software AG’s webMethods API-Portal provides a comprehensive solution that allows the developer community to find, learn about, discuss and test your APIs. This API portal not only exposes API documentation to developers inside and outside of your organization but also manages the developer on-boarding process and lets developers use exposed APIs for new and creative uses.

    Software AG’s new API portal offer significant benefits for companies working on API monetization, including:

    -An intuitive user interface and highly customizable “look and feel”
    -A single solution for both external and internal developers
    -Analytics at the API portal to help you better understand your users
    -Strong API security through the use of API keys and OAuth2 credentials support
    -Seamless integration with other webMethods components, including CentraSite, Software -
    AG’s SOA governance and SOA life-cycle management solution

    Sample Customers
    Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Retailer20%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government10%
    Non Profit10%
    Retailer9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    API Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while webMethods API Portal is ranked 23rd in API Management with 3 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while webMethods API Portal is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods API Portal writes "Stable, with good technical support, but the on-premises version can be difficult to set up". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods API Portal is most compared with IBM API Connect and Microsoft Azure API Management.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.