We performed a comparison between Agiloft Workflow and BPM and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's very safe. It has a high degree of security, much better than many other solutions I have researched."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"Agiloft does not have a good user interface."
"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."
"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"It is quite expensive."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Agiloft Workflow and BPM is ranked 45th in Business Process Management (BPM) while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Agiloft Workflow and BPM is rated 9.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Agiloft Workflow and BPM writes "Easy to use with a high degree of security and excellent flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Agiloft Workflow and BPM is most compared with , whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.