We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL], Mule Anypoint Platform, and SSIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"The solution is easy to use and developer friendly."
"It is easy to set up. The deployment is also very quick."
"SSIS' best feature is SFTP connectivity."
"I have found its most valuable features to be its package management capabilities and the flexibility it offers in designing workflows."
"Like most Microsoft products, SSIS is user-friendly and easy to use."
"The most important features are it works well and provides self-service BI."
"The UI is very user-friendly."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"In terms of its performance, it could be better. That could be something that would be easy and welcomed as an upgrade."
"The performance of this solution is not as good as other tools in the market."
"A change in the metadata source cripples the whole ETL process, requiring each module to be manually reopened."
"We'd like them to develop data exploration more."
"I have a tool called ZappySys. I need that tool to cut down on the complexity of SSIS. That tool really helps with a quick turnaround. I can do things quickly, and I can do things accurately. I can get better reporting on errors."
"It should have other programming languages supported as well from a scripting perspective. Currently, only C# and VB.NET are supported, which limits it to .NET. It should have Java support as well."
"We have a stability problem because when something works, it works one time. The next time, it doesn't work."
"We're in the process of switching to Informatica, and we need to work out data lineage and data profiling and to improve the quality of our data. SSIS, however, is not that compatible with Informatica. We managed to connect it to Informatica Metadata Manager, but we don't get good lineage, so we have to redo all our ETLs using the Informatica process in order to accept the proper data lineage."
Earn 20 points