We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL], Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The interface is really good."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"The setup is complex."
"The pricing model is problematic."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The stability could be better."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
Earn 20 points