Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] vs IBM B2B Integrator vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,686 views|814 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
SWIFT Logo
1,028 views|840 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL], IBM B2B Integrator, and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."

More Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] Pros →

"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications.""Everything from the order to fulfillment to the payment process, except for physical packing and shipping, is fully automated for some customer orders.""The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility.""It can scale horizontally as well as vertically as a cluster.""It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners.""The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive.""B2B provides a secure communication channel.""The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."

More IBM B2B Integrator Pros →

"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."

More SWIFTnet FIN Pros →

Cons
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."

More Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] Cons →

"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough.""IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly.""The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly.""Map translator needs more enhancements.""There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry.""There is no related transaction stored in the database because it's an OLTP application.""The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit.""There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes."

More IBM B2B Integrator Cons →

"I would like for them to work in real-time."

More SWIFTnet FIN Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."
  • "The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."
  • "The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."
  • "Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."
  • "The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."
  • "The product costs more than 40K."
  • More IBM B2B Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.
    Top Answer:API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Business-to-Business Middleware
    Views
    1,686
    Comparisons
    814
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    450
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    1,028
    Comparisons
    840
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pervasive Data Integrator, PDI
    IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
    Learn More
    Overview
    Pervasive's Data Integrator platform is a robust enterprise data integration software solution that enables you to quickly build powerful and frictionless connections between any kind of data source and application.

    IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

    FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

    FIN value-added processing includes:

    • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
    • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
    • Message storage and retrieval.

    It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

    Sample Customers
    Pediatrix Medical Group
    Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
    Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Transportation Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm58%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise82%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.