For stability, Cisco ACI rates a nine or 9.5 because I've seen three customers using Cisco ACI and once deployed, the solution is very stable.

Cisco ACI is a highly stable solution. Cisco has come up with a product that is as stable as 6500. We have seen a lot of stability issues in Cisco Nexus switches. When Cisco introduced Cisco Nexus in the plants, it wasn't as stable a platform as 6500 would have been. We had 6500 switches running for 19 years without any downtime. Cisco ACI follows the stability of 6500 and provides a stable environment.

Since we implemented Cisco ACI, any outages in my environment were caused by the bugs in Orchestrator. When you deploy a new policy, the bugs in Orchestrator create outages. Over the last four and a half years, Cisco has resolved the bugs within Orchestrator, and the product has stabilized. MUFG is probably among the top five percent of Cisco customers running the latest NDO and Cisco ACI, and we do not have any stability issues.

I rate the solution’s stability ten out of ten.

Stability is one of the highlights, contributing to the robustness of the solution.

The solution is stable.

It is a very stable. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

I rate Cisco ACI ten out of ten for stability.

Occasionally, we encounter the need to reset certain programs due to bugs within one of the implemented data features. This requires performing upgrades approximately every six months to address and resolve these issues. I would rate its stability capability eight out of ten.

It exhibits remarkable stability, particularly from ACI version five onwards. For instance, the stock exchange infrastructure I've worked with has been operating flawlessly on ACI for almost two years now, with no significant issues. I would rate it ten out of ten.

Cisco ACI is one hundred percent stable. My company's data centers never went down in six years of using the solution.

ACI's stability is good - I would rate it 3.5 out of five.

Cisco ACI is highly stable. I've deployed it at six or seven data centers, and we've never had any issues with stability. It's a hundred percent reliable, but you have to consider some things. You can't deploy any version of your box and expect it to be stable because Cisco has some rules. For example, Cisco has a recommended version. It means that other versions may contain bugs.

Starting in 2000, if you open a switch, you will see a small motherboard, and the switch will work forever. There was no configuration. You just ran a few commands, and everything was done. Today, when you open a switch, you see a whole computer. For example, you can deploy the Cisco Catalyst 9000 with Python script. So there have been a lot of improvements and a lot of things.

Also, when they update ACI, you will face some bugs because this isn't a limited motherboard. Now, the motherboard is like a computer. You can expect some bugs, but you won't have that many issues compared to other solutions if you use the recommended version.

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. 

I have found the stability to be good. I'd rate it nine out of ten. 

After version 5, it became a very stable product.

From an operational perspective, I think if you configure the fabric correctly, it's stable.

The solution is stable. We don't have issues with it crashing or freezing.

I have not faced any issues with performance or stability.

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. 

The solution's stability is okay.

Cisco ACI could be more stable. Bugs create performance issues.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give stability a six.

I give the stability an eight out of ten.

Cisco ACI is stable, and we haven't had any problems with the stability of the system.

I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten for stability. 

Cisco ACI used to be unstable, but after version 4.2, it's been very stable in the production environment.

Cisco ACI has matured and is a very stable product.

Cisco ACI is a stable product. 

Early on, Cisco ACI was not stable. As it matures, it improves. Integration is the biggest challenge with this hybrid solution. From a security perspective, it wasn't stable.

The maintenance of Cisco ACI depends on the project. We use different delivery teams or supporting teams on a project-by-project basis. We handle the delivery and implementation and in the back end, there is a third team that maintains operations.

The solution is definitely stable. 

The solution is stable.

It's stable.

It's stable.

So far, Cisco ACI's stability has been good because they use the Nexus hardware but with different software. 

It is stable and reliable.

In the beginning, the stability was not that good. However, the code now seems to be stable.

Our customers are very much satisfied with the stability. We do not have any issues with it.

The stability has been good so far. We've got a big project to start doing upgrades on it. But it's been very stable and functioning properly. We haven't really had any issues with it as long as I've been here at the company. I'm sure there were some issues during deployment cause that was before my time. But it's been very stable for me.

The stability seems great. It's stable so far and we haven't run into too many issues at all.

It is stable. We don't have any complaints.

The early versions of the code were buggy but now, they've gotten better. The code a year ago wasn't so great. Now, it's much cleaner and more stable. 

It has been very stable. Upgrades have been very easy. We have no real complaints about the stability of the Cisco ACI platform.

It is stable but we have faced some problems with troubleshooting. 

This solution is pretty stable.

The stability of this solution is ok.

This solution is very stable now, although it has had hiccups, for sure.

Most of the early struggles with ACI were not that it would go down. Rather, it was more the stability of the management platform, which has improved a lot over time.

The stability of this solution is pretty good.

The stability of this solution is great. We love it.

This product is pretty stable. 

With the stability so far we've had very few issues with Cisco ACI. A couple of routing problems that were glitches within ACI. Other than that, the environment is stable and we like it.

So far, the stability has been good. There have been a lot of updates going in and things are getting a lot better.

This solution has been very solid. We've had no problems in the three years that we have been using it.

The product itself is very stable. As long as it is deployed with care and solid core objects it will remain stable.

For stability, it seems fine. I have no complaints about that.

The stability of the solution looks good. The only roadblock is that it is a big change to Cisco networking.

We have been in a lot of sessions with them and have done a lot of work with it in the lab. We've seen it grow over time. The early versions of the code were buggy and flakey, but as they have gone through newer iterations, we've seen it get better. It is at the point now where were are comfortable with it going into a production data center.

I feel the stability is very good. We have had some issues but the support we get from Cisco is always good.

It's a very stable product in terms of switching fabric. It's quite reliable. It doesn't fail that much compared to other switching platforms. There are some things you need to be cautious of, like when you are configuring contracts. When you are configuring L4 and L7, you need to be aware of what type of configuration you're doing. Sometimes when you are configuring something which is third-party, not Cisco, you need to be aware of what the end result will be. So you need to do it in a test environment first, and then do it in production.

Stability-wise, we really have not had any issues with it. It's pretty stable. That's a good thing.

The stability is good. Initially, it was not that good, but now it's really good with the new code.

Right now it's stable. We haven't had to create any support issues. When doing the implementation, support was quite useful where, if somebody made a wrong connection to some other part of the network, the wrong port, they were able to track it and solve it. But in day-to-day operations, we haven't had any issues.

It's very stable. 

We haven't had any issues with stability so far. This is going to be concluded after doing some DR testing. 

It's stable. I don't think we have had any downtime or lag. It works fine. 

It is stable.

From my experience, it seems like a really stable product. The only thing that concerns me a bit is the fact that you have a lot of errors. It gives you a lot of error messages and they mostly don't really influence the functionality, so it still works. It just notifies that there is some misconfiguration and I think it will scare people with these kinds of messages that don't really have an influence on the functions. Operating the ACI fabric is a concern I have. 

The first time we used it, it was not stable, but now, a few years later, it's better. Cisco continues to work on this. If anything is not stable, tech helps us. 

It is to early to evaluate the stability.

The solution is stable. I haven't seen it crash.

The product's stability is quite good.

It is quite stable. We have not had any problems. I believe it is because of the way it is built. 

The product is stable. We use it all day.

The stability has been good so far. We still haven't brought our entire workload into ACI. We just have particular systems running on it, but they are perfectly stable. However, there is still the question mark of what will happen when we bring all our data into the new environment, and If it can carry it.

I haven't seen any major issues with stability.

The stability is generally very good, but not perfect, because it has let us down before.

The stability is perfect. We have had no problems with Cisco ACI.

The hardware is not stable. We have switches failing.

The stability is good, but it is not the best. New releases keep coming out all the time.

I am not using it day-to-day at the moment. My impression is it is working fine.

It seems fairly stable. We have not had any major hiccups.

The stability is not bad, but could be improved. In the beginning, we had integration problems, but now, it is more stable.

It is stable. The updates for Cisco ACI have been consistent with no failures.

The product is working well. It is stable. However, the solution is a bit big for us to configure.

The stability has been decent so far. We have ran into some issues: 50 percent hardware and 50 percent software, but we solved them quite quickly.

Previously, the product has had its stability issues. Now, it seems more or less okay.

In the past, there were some bugs we ran into, but those have been solved. They took some time, and we had downtime due to them. However, we have quite a good connection with Cisco tech support.

The stability has been good.

The stability is good.

It is very stable. It has 99 percent availability.

It is pretty good once it is in, then up and running. The stability is fine. I haven't had many issues.

It is very stable. It allows us to update firmware on the go without any downtime, which we couldn't do before. Everything is redundant, so if you shutdown one system, then another one takes over.

It is very stable. It works 100 percent of the time. We don't have any problems at the moment.

It is a very stable product.

It is very stable.

It is very stable.

At the moment, the stability is very good. A year and a half ago, sometimes things went wrong with it.

Since I joined, we have had about two or three outages. Sometimes the controller to the device interaction can be problematic, but otherwise, it has been quite stable.

Again, it has lots of bugs as we're the first Canadian company for which it's been used.