The most valuable feature is the complete independence of doing administrative courses for your deployment. You don't have to touch them or do fine-tuning to create more scale out or scale in. If you create your deployment with a good set of rules for how to scale in, you can just set it and forget it.
LÃder de Proyecto at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Everything works like a charm
Pros and Cons
- "If you create your deployment with a good set of rules for how to scale in, you can just set it and forget it."
- "The main area for improvement is the cost, which could be lowered to be more competitive with other major cloud providers."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
The main area for improvement is the cost, which could be lowered to be more competitive with other major cloud providers. Because eventually, the cost of the infrastructure gets higher, which means clients opt for fewer deployments in order to cut costs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for two and a half years.
What other advice do I have?
Everything in this solution works like a charm. I'd rate it as ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
An easy-to-use tool to create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources
Pros and Cons
- "AWS Fargate is an easy-to-use tool to simplify setup. You only pay for the resources you use. If you need to quickly create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources like EC2 instances, Fargate is the best service to use."
What is our primary use case?
AWS Fargate is a container-based application. I have experience with AWS Fargate for a Webex-like application similar to YouTube. One of their applications was monolithic, and the challenge was to migrate it to a container-based architecture. The customer wanted to use AWS Fargate. However, the main challenge was dealing with a Docker-type application where multiple containers needed to be created in a firewalled environment. I worked with Amazon to create a solution using a single Fargate task definition to deploy a multi-container setup successfully.
What is most valuable?
AWS Fargate is an easy-to-use tool to simplify setup. You only pay for the resources you use. If you need to quickly create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources like EC2 instances, Fargate is the best service to use.
What needs improvement?
AWS needs to work on multi-container enterprise developer components. They need to simplify that kind of setup.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using AWS Fargate for over a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable. It is not recommended for a large-scale traffic application. Fargate can be used in any application with less traffic.
How are customer service and support?
If you have the premium support, then it's very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Compared to EKS, using AWS Fargate is simpler and more efficient for developers. With EKS, developers need to manage and configure the Kubernetes cluster, which can be complex. In contrast, Fargate handles the infrastructure management, allowing developers to focus on their applications. It's more like a straightforward, automated setup.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up AWS Fargate to use private data is straightforward. You need an ECS container stored in Amazon ECR. From ECR, you can create a task definition and a service. Within a few minutes, you can have the application up and running.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The tool is suitable for testing. You have to pay for AWS only.
What other advice do I have?
AWS Fargate can be used to run almost any type of application. It requires an application container, such as an application server container, a backend container for a database like MySQL, and a frontend container, which could be a web server like Apache. Multiple containers must be deployed simultaneously, and configuring these multiple containers within a single cluster can be somewhat complex.
I recommend the tool for the initial event; you can try it out. If you feel it's reliable, you can consider adding it on. However, if you feel that it will mainly depend on your current application, you may need to evaluate it further. It is easy to learn.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free AWS Fargate Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Product Categories
Compute ServicePopular Comparisons
Apache Spark
AWS Lambda
Apache NiFi
AWS Batch
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling
Amazon EC2
Oracle Compute Cloud Service
Amazon Elastic Inference
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AWS Fargate Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which solution is better: Heroku or Fargate?
- How would you recommend selecting a compute and storage solution based on the company size?
- When evaluating Compute Service, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is quantum computing? How does it work?
- What is the best compute service solution?
- What should I look for in a compute service solution?
- What is serverless computing? What are the benefits of using this technology?
- Why is Compute Service important for companies?