Share your experience using ObjectStore

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

SAP manager at Pakistan Telecommunication Limited
Real User
Top 20
Along with an easy setup phase, users can opt for the multiple deployment models it offers
Pros and Cons
  • "The product's initial setup phase was really easy."
  • "The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

What is our primary use case?

SAP S/4HANA recently established communication with SAP HANA database. No other database can be used with SAP S/4HANA application.

SAP HANA can be used for real-time analysis and resolving queries. It has an in-memory database that uses RAM instead of hard drive disks, making it a very fast tool compared with any other relational database.

What needs improvement?

Actually, SAP HANA has a different application for each purpose. If you want a better UI experience, SAP has its own application. If a user wants to manage an application, SAP has another application. If a user wants to use the baseline command, SAP has its own tool for it where one can manage it. There is always room for improvement in every field, but right now, I can't think of any area.

The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have experience with SAP HANA.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten.

I have barely faced any issues with the product in the last two or three years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product offers scalability options. The tool offers two to three scalability options. If you are stuck on the upgrade part and you want to expand the disk space at RAM or storage levels, you can easily upgrade your hardware or networks.

How was the initial setup?

The product's initial setup phase was really easy. A user just has to choose the pre-configuration options, and the tool will prompt with every option to help what one should choose, after which the product can be installed within ten to twenty minutes.

The solution is deployed on the cloud and in the on-premises model. Depending on what a user wants, it offers an on-premises data center deployment option. People can also choose between the SAP Cloud and the public cloud options. In SAP Cloud, there are other products offered, and the cloud also helps manage the DBMS application.

What was our ROI?

Speaking about the value and benefits a company can experience from the use of the solution, I would say that if an organization plans to implement an ERP solution in their company, then it should be SAP S/4HANA as it will be very beneficial. SAP HANA provides a free database to users, but it has very limited functionality. If a company wants to get full advantage from SAP application, then they must go with SAP HANA.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The tool is expensive compared to other products, like Oracle R or Microsoft, but it offers a range of all the company's functions.

What other advice do I have?

SAP HANA is a new innovation from SAP compared to the old databases, like RDBMS. SAP HANA serves as an in-memory database that works fast and solves queries in real-time.

In terms of the most valuable functionality in speeding up data processing tasks, the main features of SAP HANA revolve around the fact that it is really easy to manage since there is no need to work on the command line, as the solution has its own application that is used for it. Our company's work and manageability parts are very easy with SAP HANA. SAP has many applications that can help my company manage SAP HANA, which is a very easy process. With the product, it is easy to manage backup and restore.

In every project, my company uses SAP HANA for data management because we have to load all the data in the DB. At that time, I never faced any error while doing any configurations since there would never be any issues with the DB part. A specific person is needed to manage the DB part. Even in a small company, there will be one person to manage the DB since it is very easy to manage by SAP HANA.

When speaking about the tool's in-memory computing can impact data analysis capabilities, if one considers the old database or RDBMS, then I would say that they have capabilities related to rows. When we execute a query or when we analyze data, the query only works with the rows as it reads every line. SAP S/4HANA allows for the aggregation of columns, making the retrieval of data very specific. I think a range of 1-1000 can be considered for the analysis of data.

SAP HANA is specifically made for SAP applications and is called S/4HANA. SAP launched HANA database with applications for SAP-related operations. SAP has certain tunings to ensure that SAP applications work better. I just use the tool with SAP applications, and I will never use it with any other applications. From SAP's end, SAP HANA is a very good database.

From the admin side, I never got involved with any integrations related to the product, but I would recommend it.

If a company wants to manage its resources, like for different functions, if an organization wants an application that can be used for enterprise resource planning, SAP is the best solution in the world.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
Irshad Mansur - PeerSpot reviewer
NET MAUI Developer at Humani Media
Real User
Top 5
Offers standard approach for storing data locally in mobile applications and stable product
Pros and Cons
  • "I haven't encountered any problems in my use cases. So, it has been a stable product for me."
  • "A potential drawback is that the database file stored within the application's local storage could be accessible to users."

What is our primary use case?

We use SQLite to store data locally within our mobile applications.

What is most valuable?

We use it for storing data within the local storage of the mobile application. That's its primary purpose.

What needs improvement?

A potential drawback is that the database file stored within the application's local storage could be accessible to users. 

When you build a mobile application with SQLite, the database file is often included in the assets folder. When the app is installed, a folder is created in the device's local storage. 

In older Android versions, it was possible to access that database file directly from the local storage. I'm not sure if this is still a concern with the latest Android versions like 10, 11, or 12.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using it for three years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I haven't encountered any problems in my use cases. So, it has been a stable product for me. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Usage depends on project requirements. Some applications need local storage, so developers might use SQLite; others might use something like Entity Framework. It varies, and sometimes, client preferences also play a role.

There might be over a hundred end users. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

SQLite was a standard approach for storing data locally in mobile applications. That's the main reason for its adoption.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup quite simple. You download the setup files from the official source, install them on your Windows system, create a database, and then copy that database file into your mobile application. The process is clear and easy to follow.

SQLite is primarily used for embedded storage in mobile applications.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is not expensive.

What other advice do I have?

There are both pros and cons to SQLite. 

  • On the positive side, it's easy to use. 
  • However, a potential drawback is that the database file stored within the application's local storage could be accessible to users. 

You need to consider both the advantages and the potential security concerns.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend using it. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate