Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText vs Tenable

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
OpenText
Based on 1727 reviews.
Tenable
Based on 234 reviews.
Latest Research
Overview
US$ $1,624. million OpenText software applications manage content or unstructured data for most types of governance, efficiency and monetization requirements in large companies, government agencies and professional service firms. OpenText solutions are aimed at addressing information management requirements, including the management of large volumes of content, compliance with regulatory requirements, and mobile and online experience management.
Tenable Network Security is a developer of vulnerability detection systems. Tenable Network Security is an American network security company, co-founded by Ron Gula, Jack Huffard, and Renaud Deraison in 2002.
Sample Customers
OpenText Core Application Security
SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.
Fortify Application Defender
ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP
OpenText Directory and Resource Administrator
NRG Energy, Kindred Healthcare, Good Samaritan Hospital
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
IMDEX
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 5
Review 1 of 5
Customer Service
Review 1 of 30
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.