SQL Server Reviews

We used SQL Server to store all of our lab data on the database. We had a front-end application that needed SQL in the background for archiving all the laboratory data.

The solution could improve by having better integration.

I have been using SQL Server for approximately three years.

The solution could be more stable.

We have approximately 200 users that use an application that uses the SQL Servers database.

The installation was straightforward. We did not have a large installation and it took a couple of weeks to complete.

Our IT department does the implementation and maintenance of the solution.

There is an annual license and it is priced reasonably.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate SQL Server a nine out of ten.

We use SQL Server for database management.

The main feature of this solution is ease of use.

I have been using SQL Server within the past 12 months.

The solution is stable and reliable.

SQL Server has been very scalable.

We have approximately 200 users using the solution in my organization.

We are satisfied with the technical support.

I previously used a different solution in the other company I worked for.

We have a hardware support partner who does the implementation.

The price of the solution could be cheaper.

I rate SQL Server a nine out of ten.

We are using it for accounts payable and accounts receivable automation. We make accounts payable and accounts receivable solutions, and we're using SQL Server as one of the building blocks.

It is integrated with Microsoft tools.

The stored procedure integration with our development could be better. Things are always changing very fast at Microsoft, and it takes a lot of resources to get on top of it. We're struggling with version control.

In terms of new features, we don't have any feature requests. We are not focusing on the database.

I have been using SQL Server for 17 years.

Its stability is okay.

Its scalability is okay.

Their technical support is okay.

It is something we have been using for a lot of years. If we're paying, it should be reasonable.

I would recommend looking at other solutions. You can also look at the Azure SQL implementation because it is easier to start with.

I would rate SQL Server a seven out of ten.

I use this solution as our data warehouse. 

We use the reports, data analysis, and for connecting our databases to multiple resources.

It's a flexible solution.

The installation process should be simplified.

The configuration could be easier.

I have been using SQL Server for a couple of months.

It's a stable solution. We have no issues with the stability.

We have 10 users in our organization who are using this solution.

We have a team made up of engineers, data analysts, and some developers to maintain this solution.

We have plans to increase your usage.

We have not contacted technical support.

Previously, I was using MySQL.

The installation is not easy, it could be easier.

It can take many hours to configure it.

I completed the installation myself.

It's a bit expensive.

The licensing is expensive.

I would recommend SQL Server to others.

I would rate SQL Server an eight out of ten.

My background is primarily in software development, and I use SQL Server among other tools in that capacity. SQL Server was one of the main databases in my previous company, and it is used for storing data from different applications.

It is easy to use and easy to perform a backup.

It is easy to find resources that can manage SQL Server.

In my experience, I've found that scalability can be improved.

I have used SQL Server while working for different companies.

This is a stable product.

We have between 40 and 50 applications running on it, which are used by many people.

The support from Microsoft is good.

The installation is simple.

We have an in-house team for deployment and maintenance.

One administrator is suitable for managing it.

In summary, this is a good product and I recommend it.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.