Spring Boot Reviews

I primarily use the solution for web applications. 

The solution has been very stable.

We like that the product is open-source. We have a lot of community support and a lot of help available in the market. It is widely being used and therefore I get a lot of information on the internet.

The initial setup is simple. 

The cloud packaging is not very straightforward, I would say. For example, integrating with Azure or a microservice architecture or cloud-based architecture is ard. If they could improve and provide a whole package at once would be great.

I've been using the solution for four to five years at this point. 

In terms of stability, the performance is good and it is a reliable product. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

I'm not sure how many people use the solution within our organization, or how often. However, my understanding is that it is widely used. 

We have our own technical people on our team. We don't have any tech support as such, however, we do have support for our guys where we can ask for detailed support and information about the environment and all those things.

The implementation process is simple and straightforward. It's not overly complex or difficult. 

If we need to integrate it with third parties, we may get assistance, however, the process is pretty simple. 

The solution is open-source and free to use. We are not a premium member and therefore do not pay any licensing fees. 

I'm just an end-user of the solution.

I pretty much work on the open-source, like the Java Spring Boot. That's it.

I would recommend the solution to others. I'd rate the product at an eight out of ten.

I primarily use the solution at the point of sale. It covers inventory management at multiple locations and reports as well. 

The solution is easier to use than Jakarta. It's easier to get things set up. 

The simplicity is excellent. 

The stability is fine.

It is not hard to set up. 

The solution is free. It's open-source. 

The database connectivity could be better in terms of dealing with multi-tenant systems. If that could be simplified, that would be better. Currently, we have to use a customer's implementation. 

I'm not missing any features. 

I've been using the solution for about three years. 

It is stable and reliable. We've had a few issues. However, those were related to coding and refactoring to improve scalability. 

The solution is very scalable. 

I've never dealt with support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they would be. 

I'm also familiar with Jakarta. Spring Boot is easier in general. 

The initial setup is very easy. It's not difficult at all. 

I don't handle the deployment process. However, we do use Docker and Kubernetes during deployment. Usually, the deployment is automated, which makes it quick to get going.

The maintenance is easy and minimal. I have no trouble maintaining it. 

The solution is free to use and open-source. 

I'm a developer, not an end-user. 

I'm looking at the latest version of the solution. I'm not on it just yet. I need to move to version three, and right now, I am on version two. 

I would highly recommend the solution in general. I'd rate it eight out of ten. 

Spring Boot is deployed on a Azure Kubernetes container.

If I have to interact with a core banking system or any other application, I use  Spring Boot.

The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is all the interactions to various applications happen using Spring Boot.

Spring Boot could improve the interface, error handling, and integration performance.

I have been using Spring Boot for approximately four years.

The stability of Spring Boot depends on the hardware being use. If you have good hardware the solution will be stable.

The scalability of Spring Boot is good.

We have more than 1,000 users using this solution.

I have not used the technical support from Spring Boot.

The intiial setup of Spring Boot is simple.

Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use.

We compared Spring Boot to .NET and we found Spring Boot to be better.

I rate Spring Boot an eight out of ten.

We are using Spring Boot for many use cases.

The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is the microservices and change information. Additionally, there are plenty of features.

The solution could improve its flexibility.

I have been using Spring Boot for approximately two years.

Spring Boot is stable.

The solution is scalable.

The support is good because of the online community, we receive a faster response.

I rate the support from Spring Boot a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of Spring Boot is easy.

I am using a free version of Spring Boot.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Spring Boot a nine out of ten.

Our use of this solution is related to creating microservices, based on microservices architecture that we're implementing now.

Since microservices are totally linked to the business capabilities and, at the same time, it is a way or a style of handling the business functionality and the business processes, Spring Boot comes into the picture where you are just focusing on building microservices for one specific business function. So that has been really helpful. You can have both the UI part and the API part, so that the microservice can be utilized either with other applications or it can be used independently.

Spring Boot is much easier when it comes to the configuration, setup, installation, and deployment of your applications, compared to any kind of MVC framework. It has everything within a single framework, rather than having the hassle of installing, setting up, or even deploying a regular MVC framework.

I'm not one who is really obsessed with Spring Boot. It's a tool. But at the same time, I would rather use other things like a BPMN engine to do the work because Spring Boot is lacking visibility in terms of how that business process or business rule would look within your application. Because everything has been embedded within the code itself, it disables the visibility and the ability to maintain or even support a specific functionality in a user-friendly manner, where a developer can come up and just adjust that part of that process.

I'd rather go for a BPMN tool or engine that will reduce development time, rather than spending the whole time writing a tiny function for linking activities or tasks together.
I would rather use a BPMN engine just to focus on the business link and, at the same time, to have that type of visibility and agility, not to mention, of course, the consistency between consumer processes and the business ability.

It's a stable solution.

It's a scalable solution.

Spring Boot is an open-source tool, a framework.

You need to have that user-friendliness so that it's really easy for both business and even IT to use the same engine. When it comes to modeling, it shouldn't be like a foreign language between IT and the business. It should be very easy to manipulate, very easy to create, very easy to design.

My most important criteria when selecting a vendor depend on specific business requirements. The business is always looking to speed up the production of these services. So agility is number one. The second is going to be the productivity and effectiveness. The third is related to the user experience; and finally, the customer support side.

I would give Spring Boot a five out of 10. Spring, as a framework, is really complex. It's not really easy for a beginner or even an intermediate developer.

We use this solution for human resources applications. 

This solution could be improved if it offered greater integration and was more compatible with other solutions. For this reason, we have moved to Microsoft. 

We have used this solution for one year.

The complexity of the initial setup is moderate, not straightforward. It took approximately one week. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

My primary use case is to develop APIs used by single-page applications. It's almost exclusively for web applications and sometimes for communication between micro services, meaning two Spring Boot apps talking to each other. I develop API and the processes, using open API to define before developing them. With Spring Boot we generate the code and we serve the API's to this single-page application or other micro services. I use it almost every day. It's open source, so we don't have any partnership with them, we're a customer. I'm a software engineer. 

Once you know how to use this solution, it's very easy, especially when building APIs. It has easily understandable convention and is an opinionated framework because of its conventional configurations. It helps build apps very fast and in particular Spring Data JPA  and Maven plugins are very useful in generating code like open API plugin. I like all the features that help with monitoring and tracking network calls between several micro services. Usually when I develop with other tele frameworks or technologies, there are things that don't work but this is not case with Spring Boots. Almost everything works smoothly and upgrading from one version to the next is very easy.

I think that security is a delicate issue in this product. It's not as easy as in other technologies so unless you already have something configured it can't be done with a junior developer. You need some experience to do that properly and to understand how Spring security works.

In addition, as many developers say, sometimes you can see too much magic without really understanding what's happening under the hood. This is the main benefit of Spring Boot, but also a disadvantage in the event that the convention doesn't work and needs to be customized. 

An additional feature they could consider would be the ability to reload properties without having to restart the application. It's one of the things I miss most. There is a solution that requires cloud tools, but there's no way to do it with a simple configuration.

I've been using this solution for about seven years. 

Once you understand the solution, it's very stable and unless you have an error in Java, it's very stable. I don't have many crashes or bugs related to the stability of the product.

Scalability depends on how and what features you use. If you have to scale a stateless API application, it's easy because you can scale it horizontally, ensuring that all the shared resources are available and that if the nodes need to talk to each other, they can. Spring Cloud helps and it's well supported and documented.

In terms of support, the documentation they provide is one of the best around and the community is very helpful. It's a very big community, so you always find the resources that you need. I've never had to contact technical support, I just open any issues on GitHub Bird to get a better idea of some concepts or problems I might have. 

The difference between Spring Boot and other systems is the ecosystem and the  community which allows for testing. Other frameworks like Python, Django, have a much smaller community so it's more difficult to get information. I also use Liferay, which is a huge monolith but has a very small community. When you need help, you need to go to the forum and wait for someone to reply to your question. It can take weeks or even months to get a proper reply because the community is so small. It's an important and valuable feature of Spring. 

There is a website called data.spring.iu where you can choose modules and download the zip file where you can start to develop, so it's easy. Deployment is simple because it's just one configuration file . If you are not an expert in servers or cloud providers, you might have some work to do but it's only one file and a few steps.

For anyone wanting to implement Spring Boot, I would recommend watching the developer, Josh Long, on You Tube. He has a lot of explanation videos showing the basics of Spring Boot. It shows what you can do in few steps, and you can then go to start.spring.iu, download your first project and start working on it.

I would rate this solution a nine out of 10. 

We are using this solution for various in-house applications and products.

Spring Boot is lightweight. The platform is easy for developers to download. It gives you a good framework and support for the different components they have.

This is not a tool for beginners. You need to know and understand it well.

It needs to be simplified, more user-friendly.

Spring Boot is only for lightweight components. You cannot have large applications on it.

If the binary size is large then you have to ensure that the services that are designed are very lightweight.  For example, if there are ten components, you have to divide them into ten and not into one. There needs to be a logical separation.

I would like to see the size of the code improved and the framework. We don't always realize how much we are loading into the microservice. There should be some limitations in place to indicate whether the code size should not exceed a certain amount and should not compile itself.

I have been using Spring Boot for approximately five years.

It's a stable product. We have not had any issues.

Spring Boot is scalable.

I have a team of 50, who are using this solution. The organization has approximately 120 users.

We plan to continue our usage with Spring Boot.

There is a very large community available online. We find enough material there.

The initial setup was straightforward.

There is a lot of documentation to get through, but there is help available online.

This is an open-source product.

Spring Boot is a good product to get started with, especially when there are services to be written, in particular, when in the new microservices area. 

They need to look for the unnecessary binary size that gets increased, otherwise, it's good.

I would recommend this solution

I would rate Spring Boot an eight out of ten.