I do not really notice anything in the product that is a glaring omission or that absolutely needs to be added. There is always room for improvement, no matter what software package you are using. I would say the room for improvement to me would be to include more diversity in what it can deploy. Right now, it is specifically for Red Hat products. Being able to deploy other products would be a benefit. For example, say if you have Ubuntu running in your network. Being able to deploy packages for Ubuntu with Red Hat Satellite for that product would be nice and would give you more of a single pane of glass solution. Having a centralized repository for your Windows patching would be nice. SCCM is a much more expensive solution than Satellite. You have got the licensing issues and all that wonderful stuff to go through. Satellite is a pretty robust solution in handling its responsibilities. Although I really have not gone through it enough to tell you all the little quirks, it would be nice to see its capabilities expanded.  

I find support to be highly responsive on most issues, however, gathering and supplying the data needed for good troubleshooting can sometimes take quite some time. It would be nice if either report was updated to include the multiple other files that are normally required, or a different tool was shipped to package logs, configurtions, etc.

I would like the direct integration with insights to be re-established. One pane (up to version 6.9) was very helpful. Although the information is available at cloud.redhat.com, it would be good to have it again inside of Satellite.

If we try to search for something online, we often find an article that does not apply to our current version anymore because there are so many different versions out there. The documentation could be better. The product should provide a link to online documentation in the application so that the user can understand what they are about to do.

The only thing I think would be great for improvement is if Red Hat could open up its platform. You know, people have mixed environments of Linux services. I know Satellite can manage Center OS because it's Red Hat-related. It can also manage Fedora because they all use a subscription manager. They all have similar systems. If it could be opened up to all Red Hat and non-Red Hat Linux platforms so that people can have a single platform for managing their Linux environments, that would be fantastic.

Another thing is that the dashboard of Satellite is not encouraging. It does not adequately showcase all the functionality it offers. It would be nice to have a CIO dashboard tailored for business users and another dashboard for technical users. There is so much that Satellite can do, but it is not effectively presented on a single dashboard. These are areas I believe they should look into.

In additional features, the first thing I would do is create a robust and customizable dashboard for both business and technical support. Secondly, I would enable remote jobs to be executed with a single click without the need for prior hardware configuration. And thirdly, I would simplify the activation process, a feature used for system compliance, by implementing a three-step button. These three additions would greatly enhance the usability and convenience of Red Hat Satellite.

There isn't anything to be added to the solution since I feel it is fully capable of meeting the requirements of its users.

Regarding the product's ability to support third-party tools, Red Hat doesn't support all the layers from the open-source version of Linux. I expect Red Hat to work and improve the aforementioned area in the future.

In the future, I want Red Hat Satellite to cover all the operating systems currently not covered by it.

The solution's initial setup is a little bit tricky.

We evaluate the possibility of implementing a cache solution to further enhance redundancy and fault tolerance in our systems which could improve the continuity of our systems, especially in the event of incidents or on-site disasters. The challenge I have noticed with standard support subscriptions is that they are often limited to lifecycle patching. Improving integration could lead to a more unified management experience for multiple operating systems within our data center.

The product's automation capabilities need enhancement. They could even provide integration with products like OpenShift or Ansible Automation Platform.

Red Hat Satellite has a short life cycle and we constantly need to update.

I would like better integration with a lighter solution rather than Performance Co-Pilot because PCP is quite heavy. We don't need all the features that PCP provides, as we are doing just fine with Centreon. If Red Hat Satellite were to do the job by itself, that would make us much happier.

The solution is expensive and one most likely needs to budget for it if you have over 100 RHEL systems to manage IMHO.

It is difficult to update and maintain.

In circumstances, where we have complex requests technical support could improve to fix issues more quickly, but for day-to-day concerns, they are good.

The interface could be more user-friendly. For example, if we take a tool like JetPatch, which is a very popular third party tool for attach management and automation, it can be very well integrated with any of the configuration in the management system. It's also user-friendly, and the reporting features are extensive. Red Hat Satellite has very good engineering but is lacking with the user interfaces and reporting.

I would like to see the scalability, user interface, and reporting features improved and for the solution to be simplified. Instead of having complex engineering, it should be simple for the user.

Red Hat Satellite's pricing needs improvement.

The usability and workflows aren't intuitive. To get the compliance management working properly, you need to put a lot of effort into it. I spent weeks trying to configure it. There was a lot of trial and error to get things working. It was very difficult. I needed dedicated support from Red Hat to customize it. 

They could make it more easy to use and improve the GUI so that it's more intuitive. Right now, it's very difficult to figure out how to get things done from there.

It doesn't integrate very smoothly with other products. They were migrating from Puppet to Ansible. Some features use Puppet, and some features use Ansible.

The documentation could be better. There isn't a lot of information or demos available.

Red Hat Satellite could be improved by adding more flexibility in reporting. 

It should basically include a complete slew of system management and monitoring tools such as Nagios. It should be a single pane of glass that gives us a complete solution. It is a good solution, but it is missing a few important things. We're using Capsule for DMVs on other secured zones. Capsule is a part of Satellite to be a proxy of sorts.

The pricing can be improved.

One of the challenges we have at the moment is managing the subscriptions for Red Hat. Apart from managing the patching for the Linux systems, we also use Satellite to manage the subscriptions that are associated to reach operating systems. There needs to be some margin for improvement in terms of the way Satellite manages subscriptions. It is still very confusing when we have different contracts or different bundles of subscriptions, and we need to manage those within Satellite in a way that's very user-friendly.

There is still some margin for improvement in terms of integration with the Ansible. Perhaps, it would be nice to be able to extend the usage of Satellite to other operating systems.

Automation can always be improved and refined to continue to make it better.

I'd like to see the ability for this tool to integrate with other developer tools like Jenkins or maybe different tools that could help us to implement and continuously deliver continuous deployment. We'd like to have some information about how to do it as well. It needs more documentation.

Red Hat Satellit requires certification when installing an RSCD agent on the patch report server. There could be a feature to simplify the process without the requirement of any patch manager subscription.

Satellite should be bundled with Ansible Tower and the Ansible Automation platform. We face challenges from a security perspective because we have micro-segmentation in our network. For each server we provision, we have to set permissions to different ports so that the servers can communicate with Satellite. If I have a single server with Satellite and the Ansible Automation Platform, it would be easier to manage security issues instead of having two or three products on various servers. 

It wasn't easy in the beginning, and some effort was required to work it out. I already had the product documentation, but it was not well organized. It wasn't easy to follow. There were a lot of documents here and there.