Oracle Linux Reviews

I am using Oracle Linux on a daily basis.

My main use case for Oracle Linux is that we have lots of applications.

A specific example of how I'm using Oracle Linux is for the server and application server for company applications.

My company uses Oracle Linux for application and monitoring purposes.

The best features Oracle Linux offers are that it's simple and easy to understand.

The usefulness of these features comes from the fact that it is an open tool, allowing for free access to all applications on the web, enabling easy testing and checking of any new application features for testing purposes. This is the main feature in Oracle Linux.

Oracle Linux features, such as being very easy to understand, allow for easy access to all repositories and packages available online, making it very helpful with no need to purchase any other packages or related subscriptions since it's totally free and easy to adopt.

Oracle Linux has positively impacted my organization through cost saving.

Oracle Linux can be improved by adding more features related to Oracle Linux and including an AI assistant.

They should provide Oracle Linux-related training videos free of cost so everyone can easily learn.

I have been working in my current field for the last 18 years.

Oracle Linux is stable in my experience and has been reliable for my organization.

The scalability of Oracle Linux is good and can handle growth and increased demand.

When we have encountered issues, we have interacted with the support team and received solutions from them, indicating the customer support for Oracle Linux is satisfactory.

Previously, we were using HP-UX before switching to Oracle Linux.

I have seen a return on investment with Oracle Linux in terms of time saved.

I am not properly informed about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Oracle Linux because I'm not involved in that aspect of operations.

It is understandable and very easy to use Oracle Linux compared to other options I considered before choosing it.

My advice to others looking into using Oracle Linux is that it is very easy and easily adaptable to any hardware. If you are choosing open-source applications, moving to the Linux environment makes Oracle Linux the best compared to Red Hat because Red Hat charges for satellite patching management while Oracle Linux offers a totally free repository to download and upgrade your Oracle without any cost.

We use Azure and OCI as our cloud provider with Oracle Linux.

Oracle Linux is deployed in my organization on-premises.

My company has a business relationship with Oracle as a partner.

I rate Oracle Linux 8 out of 10.

Since Oracle Linux is a very light software, it does not take time to deploy unless you have virtuals, or if you have containers you need to set up, which will take additional time. Installing and setting up Oracle Linux takes very few minutes.

Oracle Linux is very supportive in supporting my AI-driven projects and workloads.

The applications that we have deployed under Oracle Linux run optimally compared to environment we had hosted previously 

The most valuable feature of Oracle Linux is managing applications and managing application development on the cloud. It is more secure and easier to manage.

Oracle Linux is excellent software, and I rate its scalability an eight.

There are at least 42 people using Oracle Linux in my organization, and we have virtualized some servers where we have deployed eight VMs.

The area of Oracle Linux that needs improvement is related to updates. If they have updates, it should update itself without logging out your services.

I have worked with Oracle Linux for two years.

I rate the stability of Oracle Linux as very stable, at eight.

Oracle has implemented a chatting AI which answers most questions effectively, but getting real customer service takes some time.

Neutral

Oracle Linux is a bit easy to set up.

I have a solution on-premises, and also on cloud for containers and orchestration.

The price of Oracle Linux is affordable, and you can download it for free. It is very available on the Oracle site, and it is an open solution.

Based on my experience, I would recommend Oracle Linux to other people anytime.

Overall, I rate this solution as the best solution at nine out of ten.

I am using Oracle Linux in the IT industry.

We configure Oracle Linux and give it to our customers, which amounts to thousands of people using it.

The features of Oracle Linux that we find most effective are when we normally use it as a VPN gateway. We configure it and make it an application-level gateway, and we use it for user authentication.

The main benefits we see in this operating system, apart from the user authentication and VPN gateway, are that we were using CentOS before. Since CentOS is stopping support and going to downstream support now, we moved to Oracle Linux for that matter. Otherwise, we were satisfied with the CentOS part.

I feel that Oracle Linux should improve to have a graphical interface that would be much more user-friendly, similar to Ubuntu, so that people who want to interface with the Oracle servers can have Oracle Linux desktop on their personal laptops as well.

I would recommend that those who are planning to use Oracle Linux consider it as a 90% replacement for CentOS because most people would be moving out of CentOS due to those stream and support issues. It is a close match to CentOS, and it could reach out to end users better if the graphical user interface is improved. On the server side, it is acceptable as it is an apple-to-apple match for CentOS, but for end users, people would be comparing it with Ubuntu or Mint, so it should improve its user interface.

We have been using Oracle Linux for about a year.

I have not faced any challenges or difficulties with Oracle Linux during this time.

I have not had any stability issues with Oracle Linux.

I have not experienced Oracle Linux handling large-scale deployments; we just do a single node or double node deployment as of now.

I haven't used the scalability feature of Oracle Linux to evaluate if it is scalable enough for my environment.

We normally use the community support for Oracle Linux as of now, which is my impression on the support they provide.

I have no complaints or recommendations regarding community support.

Positive

We switched to Oracle Linux because support is not available for CentOS; the patches won't be available, which is why we have moved to Oracle Linux, and on my personal laptop, I mostly use Ubuntu.

It is easy to set up Oracle Linux compared to CentOS.

If I were to rate the setup for Oracle Linux from 1 to 10, it would receive a perfect 10.

We have customized Oracle Linux, and we use it as a VPN.

Regarding security enhancements in Oracle Linux, the patches are available, so as and when the security patches are available, we update them.

We plan to increase the usage of Oracle Linux for now.

I rate Oracle Linux as a 10 when used on a server, but if I use it as an end user in terms of desktop computing, then it could be a five because the graphics is not as impressive as Ubuntu.

My main use case for Oracle Linux is for hosting, deploying applications, and running servers.

A specific example of an application I have deployed using Oracle Linux is our currently deployed Kubernetes cluster.

In addition to my main use case, I also deploy daily applications on Oracle Linux that are utilized regularly.

Oracle Linux offers several best features in my experience, including regular updates for the operating system and patches, as well as providing the latest versions for applications and good support with other applications and software.

Regarding the regular updates and good support with other applications, Oracle Linux receives updates whenever Ubuntu updates come out, and concerning application upgrades, whenever new applications such as reference software like Netstat or Telnet become available, they also receive the latest updates on Oracle Linux.

Oracle Linux has positively impacted my organization because before using it, we were using Windows Servers, and now we are currently saving money as Oracle Linux is cheaper than Windows.

I estimate that we are saving 50 to 60 percent after switching to Oracle Linux, as Windows is not as secure and is more costly. We also have to pay for licensing with Windows, but we do not have to pay for licensing with Oracle Linux.

Oracle Linux can be improved because it does not provide more applications and software compared to Amazon Linux or Ubuntu, and it can also be more stable and support more organizations.

I chose 8 out of 10 because it can be more secure, more scalable, more stable, and provide more applications and software in Oracle Linux.

I have been using Oracle Linux for the last six months.

Oracle Linux is stable in my experience, but it can be improved.

The scalability of Oracle Linux for my workloads has been good, as I have not experienced any downtime or problems.

I have not reached out to customer support yet, but I think that customer support would be good.

Previously, I was using Windows, which was costlier, which is why I switched to Oracle Linux.

I have seen a return on investment since we switched from Windows to Oracle Linux, with approximately 50 to 60 percent savings.

My experience with pricing and setup cost for Oracle Linux is that the setup is easy, and regarding pricing, it is cheaper than Windows.

Before choosing Oracle Linux, I evaluated other options based on the reviews and ultimately chose Oracle Linux.

My advice for others looking into using Oracle Linux is that if someone wants a cheaper solution to host and deploy applications on servers and use machines as servers at a lower cost while needing a stable and scalable solution, they can use Oracle Linux.

I rate Oracle Linux an eight out of ten.

I have experience with Linux solutions.

The best features of Oracle Linux are repositories, support, and compatibility on Oracle database.

Oracle Linux's compatibility helps in integrating Oracle hardware and software effectively.

The updates are applied instantly once a CVE is identified, which makes it highly beneficial.

There is not any area that could be improved with Oracle Linux because it is very similar to Red Hat, and in our type of system, it cannot be achieved with other systems.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support with Oracle as a 9.

I rate it a 9 because for some cases, the response time is not very high. They are a little slow to respond when we have problems; however, everything else was very good.

Positive

We evaluated SUSE Linux and Red Hat as other products.

The differences between Oracle Linux and SUSE Linux include the type of subscription, the value, and the compatibility, where Oracle Linux performs better.

The initial setup with Oracle Linux was very simple because it kept using the same installing type since the start, making it very simple to adapt everything.

In terms of pricing, Oracle Linux is the best benefit for the price compared to other licensing systems.

As for my experience with the pricing and licensing, I can say that as it's from the government, we conducted research about all the prices, and Oracle Linux was the best one available for what it can achieve.

We use OCI as our main cloud provider instead of AWS.

We are clients of the government with Oracle, linked from the government.

I would rate Oracle Linux a 9 out of 10.

Our primary use case for Oracle Linux is that we are using it on Oracle Cloud. Our ERP is on Oracle Cloud as well. We downloaded a PDF to compare Oracle Linux with Ubuntu Linux for a vendor request on a project.

Our objective was to move from on-prem infrastructure to cloud infrastructure. By selecting Oracle Linux instead of Windows or Red Hat, we reduced costs significantly since Oracle Linux is free. 

Additionally, having Oracle application and operating system from the same vendor makes things easier and provides a single point of contact for resolution.

First of all, the cost is a significant advantage of Oracle Linux. The platform is stable, and there is no risk of viruses, unlike the Microsoft platform. We moved from Windows platform to Oracle Linux because it is free, leading to a reduction in costs. 

Also, since it's from the same vendor as Oracle applications, it's easier to manage issues, making not just the solution cost-effective but also streamlined in management.

The user interface for Oracle Linux could use improvement. Coming from a Windows environment, switching back to command-line interface is time-consuming. Having a user interface would make tasks easier, saving time by avoiding the need to remember command-line instructions.

We have been using Oracle Linux for more than a year now, and it has been stable without issues in our production database and application.

Oracle Linux is stable. I would rate its stability as eight or nine out of ten.

The technical support for Oracle Linux is just okay. It is not as helpful or friendly as their application support. The response is not as useful, and it could be improved.

Neutral

We were previously on Windows platform, and we moved to Oracle Linux since it is free and reduces costs.

I am unable to answer how the initial setup was as it was done by our implementation partner. They handled all the initial setup before handing it over to us.

Our implementation partner created all the virtual machines and handled the initial setup and migration project.

Oracle Linux contributed to reducing our operational costs by about ten percent by saving us from the operating system and license costs we would have had to pay Microsoft.

The cost of Microsoft OS is pretty high, and switching to Oracle Linux, which is free, reduced our costs by about 20% to 25%. For about ten servers, this was a significant saving.

The core engine of Oracle Linux is based on Red Hat, making it a stable solution quickly. It is relatively better for enterprise customers rather than individual users.

Oracle Linux is stable and cost-effective. I would rate the overall solution as eight out of ten. 

With improvements in support and user interface, Oracle Linux should continue to improve. I would recommend it depending on cost factors and enterprise suitability.

My main use case for Oracle Linux is to provision a VM and run applications or services.

A specific example of an application I run on Oracle Linux is revenue assurance and fraud management systems. Oracle Linux serves as the OS, while the application sits on the OS. We make use of some of the Linux packages that are residing on Oracle Linux to work with the application or the service. Oracle Linux also provides us with NFS and CIFS because we needed to have a central storage.

The best features Oracle Linux offers include being a Linux system designed for enterprise environments, and it is based off of Red Hat Linux, which makes it much more stable and also improves security.

The features of Oracle Linux have helped my organization because we have noticed fewer security incidents since it is a downstream of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. We get updates regularly, and we run our updates regularly, which leads to much fewer security incidents. Because it is a Linux system, we are able to get better uptime with our security patches.

Oracle Linux has positively impacted my organization by making it easier to manage and also being much cheaper than Red Hat because you do not have to pay for subscription licenses, leading to improvements and cost savings.

I wish Oracle Linux could improve its OVM because I want it to run HCI solutions where I can aggregate my local disks using technology such as vSAN, especially since Red Hat has discontinued RHEV for OpenShift.

I have been using Oracle Linux for eight years.

Oracle Linux is stable in my experience, as it is a downstream for Red Hat, making it much more stable and secure.

Oracle Linux's scalability is good because it can handle growth, as we use it in our services, and one of the services has grown from 20 to 30 servers.

My experience with customer support for Oracle Linux has been acceptable; I have had one or two opportunities to reach out to them, and the experience has not been bad.

I rate the customer support for Oracle Linux a six out of ten.

Positive

In addition to Oracle Linux, I also use Red Hat, Ubuntu, and Debian, so I have not stopped using other solutions.

I do not have any numbers or examples regarding a return on investment to share because I do not conduct any tests to be able to decide this, but I know for a fact that I do not have to pay for subscription or licensing, and because it is Red Hat-based, most people know how to use it.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Oracle Linux has been very positive because when it comes to licensing and the likes, as I said, it is a downstream of Red Hat, so you do not have to pay much for licensing or subscription. The only thing you have to pay for is support.

I did not evaluate any other option before choosing Oracle Linux; I just went for it.

I do not manage the system, but I manage the OS, so that is what I can provide.

The cost savings from using Oracle Linux come from the fact that since it is a downstream of Red Hat, you do not have to pay for subscription, while you enjoy most of the benefits of Red Hat, so we use it.

I would advise others looking into using Oracle Linux to try it, and if they are comfortable with it, then they can go ahead.

I gave this review an overall rating of seven out of ten.

Oracle Linux serves as a cost-effective alternative to RHEL for my organization. My main use case is that Oracle Linux is freeware for RHEL, and where RHEL is required, we use Oracle Linux.

For our product-based company, we use load testing tools that require generators. All generators have RHEL-based VMs, so we use Oracle Linux because it is freeware, whereas RHEL is subscription-based and requires a number of subscriptions. We use it for testing purposes and in the production environment, where we spin up more than 50 VMs and sometimes require 100 VMs, making it significantly more cost-effective.

Oracle Linux offers the best features because it is designed for enterprise edition and is freeware, which means it does not require any subscription, making it highly cost-effective.

The cost savings from using Oracle Linux have positively impacted my projects. As I mentioned, in a product-based company that requires multiple servers to generate load, purchasing RHEL subscriptions would cost considerably more. Using Oracle Linux has saved us substantial money since it does not require any subscription.

Oracle Linux has positively impacted my organization by making processes easier and helping reduce costs.

From a cost perspective, if I generate a load on 100 VMs, I would need 100 subscriptions for RHEL. Instead, we are using Oracle Linux, which is free. For stability, I am not facing any issues while using Oracle Linux.

Oracle Linux can be improved by making it more similar to RHEL. However, I do not have any specific suggestions for improvements.

I have been working in my current field for over six years. I have been using Oracle Linux for over five years.

The performance and stability of Oracle Linux are good, and I am not facing any issues while using it. Oracle Linux is stable.

We use Oracle Linux for auto-scaling, and it works efficiently.

There is no customer support for Oracle. I have not interacted with customer service.

Before using Oracle Linux, I used CentOS, which is also freeware for the RHEL family. When I use Oracle Linux, it is much smoother than CentOS.

I have seen a return on investment with Oracle Linux through money saved.

Before choosing Oracle Linux, I evaluated CentOS. I found Oracle Linux is better than CentOS.

If others require RHEL or RHEL family Linux, they should use Oracle Linux as it is truly useful and more similar to RHEL. I would rate this product nine out of ten.