Leaderboard for OpenText Functional Testing
Check out the members with the highest scores who have reviewed OpenText Functional Testing.
645
Points
CTO at Marco Technology
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Has an initial setup phase that is easy but needs to be made more script-based
#2. Andres_Gomez
280
Points
Support Engineer at a computer software company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Efficient automation with AI-enhanced testing features#3. David-Whitehouse
190
Points
QA Lead at a financial services firm
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Transition to database validation addresses browser dependency issues while scripting in a limited…
#4. Vinod-Parmar
155
Points
Manager, Technical Services Owner at Insignia
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
A reasonably stable product that needs to be made easier for developers to use
#5. Pierre CAHAY
145
Points
Senior Manager at Deloitte
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Achieves significant ROI with market-leading features but needs a better user interface
#6. Don Ingerson
140
Points
Sr. QA Automation Engineer at a manufacturing company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
UFT One supports a large variety of Technologies and Automates both Functional and API testing#7. RuneMidtvedt
130
Points
Senior Consultant at Tieto Sweden AB
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Great for recording and automating test cases
#8. Victor Horescu
130
Points
Owner at iQST
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Provides recording option for test script creation and maintenance
125
Points
QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development#10. Geetha gg
110
Points
QA automation Architect Manager at BMO Financial
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Useful for validation and functional test cases