Leaderboard for OpenText Functional Testing
Check out the members with the highest scores who have reviewed OpenText Functional Testing.
545
Points
CTO at a non-profit
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Has an initial setup phase that is easy but needs to be made more script-based
#2. Andres_Gomez
280
Points
Support Engineer at a computer software company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Efficient automation with AI-enhanced testing features#3. David-Whitehouse
210
Points
QA Lead at a financial services firm
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Transition to database validation addresses browser dependency issues while scripting in a limited…
#4. Mirza Hussain
205
Points
Engineer at a manufacturing company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Use descriptive programming and object repository efficiently with potential for improving storage…
#5. Kevin Copple
195
Points
Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Has supported faster test execution and increased flexibility while offering room to improve support…
#6. Don Ingerson
180
Points
Sr. QA Automation Engineer at a manufacturing company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
UFT One supports a large variety of Technologies and Automates both Functional and API testing
#7. Pierre CAHAY
165
Points
Senior Manager at a tech vendor
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Achieves significant ROI with market-leading features but needs a better user interface
#8. Vinod-Parmar
155
Points
Manager, Technical Services Owner at a insurance company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
A reasonably stable product that needs to be made easier for developers to use#9. Geetha gg
130
Points
QA automation Architect Manager at a financial services firm
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Useful for validation and functional test cases
#10. Victor Horescu
130
Points
Owner at a tech services company
Reviewed OpenText Functional Testing:
Provides recording option for test script creation and maintenance