We were using CyberArk, but we switched to One Identity Safeguard because it was costly. Everything was good with CyberArk, but we needed to scale, and the licensing costs were high.

We are still evaluating other options before choosing One Identity Safeguard, but so far, we see that One Identity Safeguard is much better.

We are still evaluating other options before choosing One Identity Safeguard, but so far, we see that One Identity Safeguard is much better.

Before choosing One Identity Safeguard, I evaluated other options based on simplicity, price, and functionality.

Before that, we evaluated CyberArk. We selected One Identity Safeguard because it offered better integration with our existing infrastructure and streamlined automation for our multi-client infrastructure, which suited our operational and compliance needs.

CyberArk, which is essentially the industry standard right now, is doing a very primitive job of helping the administrator with the task, and One Identity Safeguard is a lot better at this.

I evaluated other options such as CyberArk and BeyondTrust before choosing One Identity Safeguard.

We previously used CyberArk. The reason for switching was that we needed easier multi-client management for our customers with hybrid cloud environments and better integration with Jira, SIEM, and RPA workflows across multiple customer cloud environments.

I previously used One Identity before switching from CyberArk to One Identity Safeguard.