KNIME Business Hub Reviews

We use KNIME for analyzing data, for ETLs, and analyzing for machine learning.

KNIME is easy to learn. You can code with KNIME using the visual coding platform if you know how to code. If you're working in an account management or financial department, you can use KNIME to work with a huge amount of data quickly. You can use KNIME to schedule your workflows, send emails, and write codes.

The main issue with KNIME is that it sometimes uses too much CPU and RAM when working with large amounts of data.

I have been using KNIME for eight years.

KNIME is a stable solution. In the previous version, sometimes KNIME would get stuck, and we had to restart the server too many times. Sometimes, we faced a lack of memory issues with the solution.

I rate KNIME an eight out of ten for stability.

Less than ten users are using KNIME in our organization.

I rate KNIME an eight out of ten for scalability.

KNIME’s technical support team responds quickly. You can write your problems in the solution's forum, and they will answer you.

KNIME's initial setup is not easy and needs someone who knows Linux to do it.

A Linux engineer can deploy KNIME quickly, whereas someone who doesn't know Linux will take longer.

There is no cost for using KNIME because it is an open-source solution, but you have to pay if you need a server.

KNIME is a perfect solution for small and big companies, especially people who are using Excel. KNIME is very easy to learn and implement, and doctors and lab personnel can use it. Lots of companies are supporting KNIME and writing their own extensions. Data analysts and data scientists are using the solution for ETI processes.

Overall, I rate KNIME an eight out of ten.

I am promoting the use of KNIME because of my background as a computer scientist and my experience programming in languages, such as Pascal, Python, and R. Many of my junior colleagues at the university lack proficiency in computing, and KNIME is an effective tool for introducing beginners to programming. The platform is user-friendly and does not require coding, making it accessible for those who can learn the basics in just an hour through video tutorials.

One way KNIME has improved our organization is by allowing us to perform analyses that we previously couldn't. We often start with data in Excel or CSV format, and the process of importing data from other software, such as SPSS or STATA can be challenging. With KNIME, the process is simplified, as we can easily import the data with a single node, making it quick and efficient.

There are many valuable features in KNIME. One of the most useful aspects is that it can read a wide variety of data file types. Additionally, the ability to manipulate data, such as deleting rows or columns, is very helpful. I also use many of the nodes for analyzing data, such as doing frequencies and cross tabs. I have used it for machine learning tasks, like decision trees and random forests. It also has neural network capabilities, but I am not an expert in that area, so I cannot comment on it.

It's a very powerful and simple tool to use.

KNIME has met all of my needs so far. It has excellent data visualization capabilities. Additionally, it has a text analysis package, which I haven't used. However, I am satisfied with the features currently available and it has a strong support community.

One area that could be improved is increasing awareness and adoption of KNIME among organizations. Despite its capabilities, it is not as well-known as other tools.  The advertising and marketing efforts to reach out to companies and universities have not been very successful.

I have been using KNIME for approximately two years.

KNIME is highly stable, it's been working for over 10 years.

In terms of scalability, I haven't personally pushed KNIME to its limits. I have used it to work with tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of cases and it has performed well on my own Microsoft Windows 10 PC. It has completed everything I wanted to do within a maximum of 10 seconds, but usually much less, often taking only a second or two. It sometimes seems immediate, but I have not tested it with hundreds of thousands or millions of cases.

The server version is certainly scalable. However, I am not using that version. I am using the desktop version, known as the Workbench. The server version can handle large datasets, such as those found in genomics, proteomics, and chemistry databases that are in the millions, so it is clearly capable of scaling. I am not able to comment on the performance of the server version as I have not personally used it.

I have not contacted the company for technical support. They have a community hub where many users contribute and I have used that for assistance and it has worked well for me. I am not commenting on the company's specific support services, but rather on the facility provided by the company for users to communicate with each other. Often, you can't distinguish whether the person providing the advice is an official representative of the company or a fellow user.

The support provided by the community hub is excellent. You can post questions and usually receive a reply within 24 hours. Sometimes you even receive workflow that can be easily integrated into your own work, saving you the time and effort of retyping it.

The initial setup of KNIME is trivial. I only needed to download and it run.

For beginners, the free desktop version is very attractive, but the full server version can be more expensive. I have only used the free version and it offers a fair pricing system. I have been promoting it to others without any compensation or request from the company, simply because I am enthusiastic about it. I am not aware of the pricing for the server version, but it seems to be widely used.

My advice to others starting out with the solution is for them to look up videos on the solution because there are hundreds of them, but start with the small ones.

You can begin using KNIME with a one-hour introduction, which provides enough knowledge to complete most research tasks, but it does not cover all the fine details of the platform. KNIME offers tens of thousands of packages, or nodes, that are available for download to perform various tasks such as text processing or regression. It is not possible to learn all of it at once, it's best to start with analyzing data that interests you and then expanding your knowledge as you go along. The platform is reliable, as new features are thoroughly tested and it has never failed me in the many times that I have used it.

I rate KNIME a nine out of ten.

I use KNIME to simplify the modeling process. 

The tool's analytic capabilities are good. 

I wish there were more video training resources for KNIME. The current videos are very short, and most learning is text-based. Longer training sessions would be helpful, especially for complex flowchart use cases. Webinars focusing on starting projects and analyzing data would also be beneficial.

The solution is scalable. 

I haven't contacted the tool's support yet. 

The tool's deployment is easy. 

I use the tool's free version. 

It takes some time to get familiar with it. I'm not sure how long it will take in the meantime. If one person learns it but the whole institution doesn't use it, that's a problem. Some people in our department use QuickSight, I use Tableau. We speak different languages, and it's hard for us to work together. Some use KNIME. We use it and then stop. We switched to Tableau, but it's expensive, so they're trying QuickSight. I don't know which platform we'll end up using.

We're still exploring KNIME for data manipulation, though Tableau or Power BI might be more convenient. I've used Alteryx before, and KNIME seems similar. I mainly use KNIME for machine learning, not as much for data manipulation.

I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.

We use KNIME for a lot of predictive modeling. We use it to grab data, prepare it for modeling, do automated machine learning analysis, sometimes forecasting, and then try to deploy the models into production.

Since KNIME is a no-code platform, it is easy to work with. You don't have to write any codes and try to fix all the bits and pieces of coding or the intricacies of the programming language. Instead, getting a quick data prep or big data and eventually running it through your hypothesis is pretty fast. It's not ideal for huge data sets worth gigabytes, but it's okay since very few people have big data sets.

KNIME is not good at visualization. I would like to see NLQ (Natural language query) and automated visualizations added to KNIME.

I have been using KNIME for two to three years.

Unless you are working with terabytes worth of data, KNIME is a stable solution.

The solution is scalable and can be used up to terabytes of data. Around two to three people are using the solution in our organization.

The solution’s initial setup is quick and easy.

One person can deploy the solution within ten minutes.

The solution is very essential when we require an explainable data modeling pipeline. We can show the workflows of KNIME to our customers and talk about it instead of showing the code and expecting them to read, which they can never do.

The process of providing KNIME to the client, how it works, where we get the data, what the initial data statistics were, and what we get in return are pretty explainable. We worked on multiple retail projects and insurance scoring projects.

KNIME is perfect for data pre-processing projects. The important thing is that when someone builds a KNIME workflow, we can quickly onboard and change it for something else. It means that we don't need to read and understand the code. It means that it's replicable and reusable.

If somebody does something, somebody else can quickly onboard and enhance, improve, or totally change the workflow from scratch. It's pretty hard and time-consuming for typical use cases where we utilize coding. KNIME's open-source nature has a good impact on our analytics work.

Recently, KNIME added something relevant to generative AI integration, which was a good move. Alteryx is slightly more powerful than KNIME, and Dataiku is more powerful than both KNIME and Alteryx. I sometimes work with the on-premises version of KNIME and sometimes the cloud version. The solution does not need any maintenance.

Users should quickly start using KNIME for whatever they want to do, and they'll learn it on the go easily. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I'm a professor at the local university. So, I used it to train virtual students in mechanical engineering.

I'm training a class for mechanical engineers on factory utilization and the basics of data science. That's what I use it for.

It's pretty straightforward to understand. So, if you understand what the pipeline is, you can use the drag-and-drop functionality without much training. Doing the same thing in Python requires so much more training. That's why I use KNIME.

In the last update, KNIME started hiding a lot of the nodes. It doesn't mean hiding, but you need to know what you're looking for. Before that, you had just a tree that you could click, and you could get an overview of what kind of nodes do I have. 

Right now, it's like you need to know which node you need, and then you can start typing, but it's actually more difficult to find them.

I have been using it for four years. 

I've never had any problems with it, so it's a ten out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. For a basic training course, it's still fine. But I'm not a professional in using KNIME.

I used RapidMiner. I have not been using it in six years. I used to use it six years ago. Then I switched to KNIME because a lot of my colleagues are using KNIME, so it felt like the right way to do it.  

Moreover, I switched from one university to another, and at my new university, other colleagues are using KNIME as well. So, for the students, it's easier to go just with one product.

Overall, it's still easier than using Python, so it's still fine. But, actually, they made it more complex by switching from the last version to the one before.

We're using the free academic license just locally. I went for KNIME because they have a free academic license. And to be honest, I never bothered to check the prices.

I like it a lot. I would advise that you shouldn't be afraid of data science. It's actually straightforward.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

As a university professor instructing courses on data mining and machine learning, I incorporate both KNIME and another software application into my teaching. This approach allows me to demonstrate various use cases effectively. I actively engage my students by having them utilize both software applications, providing practical hands-on experience in the areas of data mining and machine learning.

The most valuable is the ability to seamlessly connect operators without the need for extensive programming.

To enhance accessibility and user-friendliness, there is a need for improvements in the interface and usability of deep learning and large-scale learning languages.

I have been using it for more than ten years.

I would rate its stability capabilities nine out of ten.

It provides good scalability abilities, I would rate it eight out of ten. Currently, more than sixty individuals use it on a daily basis.

They are helpful and I am highly satisfied with their customer support services. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Positive

We use Orange as well.

The initial setup is straightforward.

While there are certain limitations in functionality, you can still utilize it efficiently free of charge.

I would recommend it, especially for those who prefer not to program or have limited coding intervention. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

I use KNIME for analysis-related purposes. I am currently in the process of developing some models for analysis.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a user-friendly tool where a person doesn't have to get involved with codes since you just need to drag the nodes to create your model, which is a very easy process for me.

The most difficult part of the solution revolves around its areas concerning machine learning and deep learning. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement.

I have been using KNIME since 2019. I am an end user of the solution.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

I am the only user of the solution in my company. I do provide training to other employees in my company on how to use KNIME.

I have experience with Excel, and I faced some limitations since my company had loads of data to analyze. Considering that my company had loads of data to analyze, I would say I find KNIME to be very useful.

My company has some problems related to the solution's updates. I don't know if there are some restrictions from my organization because of which I cannot update or install some extensions.

The solution can be deployed in a few minutes.

The solution is currently deployed only on my personal computer, which I use in my company.

Only one person or an IT administrator is required to take care of the installation phase of the product.

KNIME is a cheap product. I currently use KNIME's open-source version.

I have experience with Python. Compared to Python, KNIME is better because of the user-friendliness it provides. With KNIME, you don't have to get involved with codes. KNIME provides nodes, making it a very easy tool to use.

I have not received any response from my company, though I had proposed to my organization to buy KNIME so that we can use it on the servers since, right now, it is like a standalone tool used on my personal computer only. I am just a basic and not an advanced user of KNIME. I find KNIME to be a very useful tool.

Speaking about the maintenance phase of the product, I would like to say that I cannot update the solution. If a new version is released, I cannot update the product. I always have to request my organization and the IT team to download and install the product's new version for me.

I recommend others to use KNIME. I have recommended KNIME to my colleagues.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

We have been using the most recent version. It's version 4.6.

10 August 2023 - It has now been upgraded to 5.0 and is, if anything, even more impressive, especially in its ability to use Python and its libraries.

Knime seems to keep getting better. Their open-source model seems to be working. The addition of AI both to help in the building of workflows and as a facility within a workflow once it is up and running seems to add a dimension. At the moment, though, the system is so rich and fully featured that I have explored only the surface of the new version (5.4).

To date, all my needs have been met by earlier versions of Knime. I am, though, confident that should I need to start using version 5.4, the process will be smooth, and the new functionality fit for purpose. Upgrades to Knime have always worked like that in the past and I would expect them to do so in the future.

I used to be a Pascal programmer, and then I did a bit of Python. It does many of the things that I would've had to do in code, but does so without using code. I don't think it does everything, but it does most of what I need to do.

It can read many different file formats. It can very easily tidy up your data, deleting blank rows, and deleting rows where certain columns are missing. It allows you to make lots of changes internally, which you do using JavaScript to put in the conditional.

For example, I have one data set whereby all of the data is encoded and there was one variable called opinion or something like that and it had codes for what the topic was, which was being discussed, whether it was positive or negative, whether it was strongly worded or weakly worded, and so many other things like that.

I had to transfer those into columns, like sentiment, the strength of sentiments, topic being discussed. I had to split it up into columns, and I could do that very easily, like simple JavaScript, in their column expressions.

It also has very good fundamental machine learning. It has decision trees, linear regression, and neural nets. It has a lot of text mining facilities as well. It's fairly fully-featured.

They are also very careful with things like lab variants and issued variants because they have some labs that develop nodes, and new chunks of code which are represented as an icon. They make it very clear that those lab ones are not fully tested, and they're very glad to get comments back if you have problems.

I haven't had that difficulty myself. They seem to be aware that they have the community there as their testing base, and they seem not to be embarrassed about that. They will tell you when they go wrong and try to put it right.

So far, I haven't had problems with it, so I haven't really thought about room for improvement. It's so much better than many other things. It's useful in that you can at least get people who are pretty averse to programming to start thinking about putting something into a program of any kind, because they can see what's happening.

It's visual. It's codeless. For some purposes, I'd want to add Python or R, but I haven't had to do that so far, so I haven't seen the shortcomings of it. There must be some. All software has shortcomings, but I haven't recognized any myself.

Not just for KNIME, but generally for software and analyzing data, I would welcome facilities for analyzing different sorts of scale data like Likert scales, Thurstone scales, magnitude ratio scales, and Guttman scales, which I don't use myself.

I use both Thurstone scales and magnitude ratio scales quite a bit, and they're very powerful. But I've always had to do all the analysis myself in some simple code. I don't think that's provided. You could probably include it in KNIME, but I haven't tried to do it.

If it just said, "Analyze scales," and you'd choose which sort of scale you want to analyze and it gave you the options of normalizing or reversing or whatever it happens to be, that would be helpful. There are lots of simple functions that you want to apply to scales, which would be useful in any software, including KNIME.

I have been using this solution for about a year, but most particularly in the last six months.

It's been remarkably stable, much more so than most software. They have an active community forum. Problems seem to get fixed pretty quickly. I haven't had problems, but other people do report problems. So, there must be problems there, I just haven't had any.

On the very rare occasions that I have to seek advice, I just post it to the forum and someone will offer advice.

Positive

Compared to RapidMiner, at the moment I would go for KNIME, but that's largely because I haven't used RapidMiner much for the last year. It may have improved enormously since then. It was a very good package. They do much the same thing.

I'm more familiar with KNIME, so I would be able to talk more about it, whereas for RapidMiner, I was very enthusiastic when I used it. KNIME is a bit cheaper in a sense.

In RapidMiner, you can have up to 10,000 rows of data free of charge. For many things that I do, 10,000 rows of data is enough. I use quite a few UK government surveys, and I get the raw data from the UK Data Archive. They're often of the order of 10,000, 8,000. So, under 10,000 rows. I could use it free of charge.

I just downloaded it and then ran it. The process really was that simple. If I need one of the extensions (e.g. text mining), the process is just as simple.

We implemented the solution in-house.

I have not formally calculated it, but it must be substantial.

With KNIME, you can use the desktop version free of charge as much as you like. I've yet to hit its limits. If I did, I'd have to go to the server version, and for that you have to pay. Fortunately, I don't have to at the moment.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

I'm unwilling to give anything a ten because everything can be improved. But it's been very useful so far to me and has saved me many hours of work. I could have written it all in Python if necessary, but it would have taken me weeks for what would be a few days of work.

My advice is to just download it and use it. The documentation is pretty good. There are many good videos online for it. If you go to YouTube, you can get pages and pages of KNIME tutorials. They're pretty clear, and they are produced by people who've used it. It's not just company advertising, as far as I can see.

KNIME is an excellent product, and I've used many other platforms like Google Collab, Azure, and even AWS. However, KNIME, especially for AI and machine learning, is very different. It's almost no-code. You can add code if needed, but it's not necessary.

KNIME has hundreds, maybe even thousands of modules, which are called nodes. These nodes, along with their libraries, are essential for solving specific issues or problems. You can select the nodes you need, and they come pre-recorded as visual boxes. You just need to assemble the nodes required for your solution. As mentioned earlier, you can search for libraries and select the appropriate nodes, then combine them to form your entire workflow. KNIME supports coding in Python and other languages, but you can assemble the nodes visually without writing code. Each node has a specific function, and if one node doesn't suit your needs, you can easily replace it with a different one.

Additionally, each node has inputs and outputs, and you can configure them based on your requirements. Once the nodes are set up, you can attach the data and let it flow through the nodes to execute your workflow.

One significant improvement is its speed. With KNIME, you can accomplish many tasks in a single day. It's very fast since you mostly work with prebuilt nodes and libraries. Also, the latest version allows us to add Python code if needed.

There are several valuable features. First, it's a free product. Second, its speed due to the no-code approach. And third, its a comprehensive library of nodes that covers almost anything you need.

One thing to consider is that the prebuilt nodes may not always be a perfect fit for your specific needs, although most of the time, they work quite well. 

However, if you encounter very complex requirements, you might need to add custom code to achieve your desired outcomes. This is an area that could use some improvement, but the advantage is that it encourages you to evaluate and minimize coding efforts. As a result, you can reduce the overall amount of coding required, which is a positive aspect of KNIME.

Another area that could be improved is related to the libraries. While they are quite extensive, they might not always match your exact needs. In such cases, you might have to do some coding to tailor the solution accordingly.

Therefore, one area for improvement is the flexibility of prebuilt nodes, as they may not always match complex needs perfectly. Also, enhancing clarity on what the nodes do would be beneficial.

For additional features, there are a couple of things that come to mind. Firstly, it would be great to have more clarity on what each node does. Sometimes, it's not very apparent, and additional information would be helpful. 

Secondly, it would be beneficial to have better ways to interact with and manage nodes, enhancing the user experience. 

And finally, I think KNIME could improve on how easily it allows for extending functionalities with custom code. Although it's relatively straightforward now, making it even more accessible would be advantageous.

We have been using KNIME for two years. We currently use the latest version.

Stability is excellent. I would give it a nine out of ten.

As for the on-prem version, I would rate the scalability around a seven out of ten because it's definitely scalable, but we haven't really pushed it to its limits.

KNIME provides good support. The only challenge is that they are in Germany, so sometimes the time difference can be a factor. As it's a free product, they may not be available all the time. But the platform itself is easy to use, and they have very good documentation, so we rarely need technical support.

Neutral

The deployment is not very hard or time-consuming on-premises. The only challenge is dealing with hardware limitations like memory and GPUs.

Currently, we deploy KNIME on-premises, but there is a paid cloud option available.

We have seen an ROI. In my case, as a consultant, I can create proofs of concept very quickly using KNIME. For example, if a client wants to explore a specific idea but is already committed to using platforms like Azure, Google Analytics, or AWS, we can still use KNIME to demonstrate the concept. This allows us to try out new ideas and algorithms before implementing the full project on their chosen platform, such as AWS, if needed.

The proof of concept approach is especially helpful when clients need to validate the feasibility of certain algorithms or machine learning techniques. 

The price for the cloud version is very reasonable compared to other products at the same scale. If you expand to the same scale, KNIME could be a more cost-effective option.

If you're evaluating KNIME, make sure to use a comprehensive use case. Sometimes, users might not find the nodes they need in the libraries, but most likely, it's due to improper searching. KNIME offers a unique platform with a wide range of nodes, so thorough exploration is essential to fully benefit from its capabilities.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten because I have not yet tried every feature. Otherwise, KNIME is really a great product.

It's mostly data preprocessing, handling, and processing (ETL) processes, as well as expanding the transport load. 

Additionally, we also work on various machine learning tasks, such as regression models and other small topics related to machine learning.

I've tried to utilize KNIME to the fullest extent possible to replace Excel. Our company has been heavily reliant on Excel for generating reports and performing data transformations. With KNIME, I've been able to combine data from Excel, SQL Server, and various other resources efficiently.

There are a few aspects that I am not entirely satisfied with. For instance, when integrating KNIME with our SAP system ERP and HANA, it's not as straightforward as expected. We need to find alternative connectors like the Teradata connector, which adds complexity.

So far, I've had some problems integrating KNIME with other solutions. Thus, it could be an area of improvement. 

We have been using KNIME for two years.

Overall, the product has been stable. It has efficiently handled the tasks we have encountered so far.

There are two end-users using KNIME in our organization. Because we are still beginners, we are only using it to learn how it works and get a better understanding of the system. We are not yet certain if we will use it extensively for all topics.

The initial setup was easy. 

I deployed the solution myself. 

We use the free version only. 

We are working with KNIME on some small projects, but we are also looking for an alternative solution to explore.

Overall, I would rate KNIME a seven out of ten because we faced a problem with the integration with other products, like SAP.