Grafana Loki Reviews

We use the solution to collect logs from our environment. We review them if there's any trouble in the system.

The product is easy to deploy. It has major compatibility features. The tool can be used in multi-cluster environments. Grafana Loki is the best possible solution in the market. It is a lot better than Elasticsearch.

The product must improve its UI. I have heard that Kibana is more friendly. It might be because of the speed at which the logs are generated, but it depends entirely on how the system is configured.

I have been using the solution for almost two years.

The tool is stable.

The tool is scalable. I am the only user. In my previous company, my whole team was using the solution.

The solution is deployed on both AWS and Azure.

The solution is open source. It makes things much easier. The enterprise version might require a license fee.

I recently changed jobs and am trying to get my new team to use Grafana Loki. They are currently using Elasticsearch. Considering the market, I would recommend the product to others. The deployment is easy, but the management is hard. However, it is far better than Elasticsearch. Overall, I rate the tool an eight or nine out of ten.

We use the solution for Docker logs monitoring and system-level information.

Grafana Loki is easy to monitor and detect errors.

We face some bugs when we install the latest version of Grafana Loki.

I have been using Grafana Loki for two years.

Grafana Loki is a scalable solution. Around 100 users use the solution in my organization.

The solution's initial setup is easy if you follow the official documents.

Grafana Loki is an open-source solution.

It is easy for a beginner to learn to use Grafana Loki for the first time. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.