We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"It is a very stable product."
"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 28th in Business Process Design. webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with .
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.