We performed a comparison between StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] and Veritas NetBackup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."I like that they have some new devices that are simpler to use because they kind of tie right into the cloud."
"The most valuable feature is the backups."
"Includes snapshots and multiple database agents."
"Good graphical user interface. It's easy to create policies and to do installs."
"Management interface was simple to use once understood."
"Veritas NetBackup Automatic Image Replication and CloudCatalyst features allow me to replicate deduped backup images from one site to a remote site, as well as duplicating deduped images to the Cloud (i.e. AWS S3, etc.)"
"The main thing I like about NetBackup is CloudPoint. You can take a snapshot of the endpoint and back it up with CloudPoint. The data backups are the most important."
"The backup and restore features are helpful."
"Could be used for both of Physical and Virtual Environments."
"Veritas NetBackup is very stable and scales out very well."
"StorageCraft ShadowXafe should improve the on-premises console management controls and protection and recovery."
"Their restoration protocols could be better. I pulled all my clients out of their cloud mostly because I wasn't confident that they could restore out of the cloud. This was backed up by friends who had been burned by stuff like that. We moved away because of the lack of resources to restore from a potential catastrophic failure. It's challenging, and in some cases, they couldn't do it because they didn't have enough resources. For example, if there was a major disaster, and everybody needed their images out of the cloud, they couldn't give them to everybody."
"The product is not able to keep up with other competitors in the market."
"There is room for improvement in the implementation of Power servers."
"The product needs to improve its GUI. It needs to make use of a web interface."
"The database integration could be better."
"When the customer is using SaaS applications like Office 365, the integration falls short and needs to be improved."
"There could be granular control over metadata components, specifically in the context of JSON data for the product."
"Support for the solution needs improvement."
"The ability to use different disk appliance brands as Pure Disk (not OST), such as EMC Data Domain ."
More StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery while Veritas NetBackup is ranked 5th in Backup and Recovery with 112 reviews. StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Veritas NetBackup is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] writes "An expensive next-generation data recovery and backup software solution with poor data restoration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup writes "Efficient data recovery and replication features ". StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Veritas NetBackup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veritas NetBackup Appliance, Azure Backup and Veritas Backup Exec.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.