SkyKick Cloud Manager vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SkyKick Logo
278 views|147 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
312 views|259 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SkyKick Cloud Manager and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Technical support has been good."

More SkyKick Cloud Manager Pros →

"vCenter Orchestrator is easy to use.""The DRS feature from VMware is very valuable to us because it balances workloads.""What I like best about vCenter Orchestrator is that it makes life easier through automation. People can request to automate all processes with vCenter Orchestrator, such as adding storage, creating VMs, removing VMs, and extending VMs.""If I need to do DR, VMware can enable me to use vMotion, which requires use of vCenter. You cannot do vMotion without vCenter. We do a lot of automation, orchestration, and simplification for that purpose.""The product's initial setup phase was easy.""User-friendly and easy to deploy.""In regards to the workflows, the fact that we can actually have a full dashboard library of all the existing workflows on this is great. We can see all the workflows and what all the actions do and can work with scripts.""We can scale the solution."

More vCenter Orchestrator Pros →

Cons
"I'm fairly new to the solution and need to explore it further."

More SkyKick Cloud Manager Cons →

"The scalability option provided by the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.""This is an expensive solution.""It is too expensive. One of the main issues is the price.""In the next release, to make it easier to write the workflows, I would l like to see more HTML GUIs.""I liked the previous client better than the current web client of vCenter Orchestrator, though my colleagues like the client now. The technical support for vCenter Orchestrator needs improvement.""The interface could be improved to bring greater user-friendliness and ease of use.""It could be integrated with third-party hypervisors.""I would like to see, from within the Web Console, being able to define the project and custom templates per user; almost like how CloudSpec has approached the solution."

More vCenter Orchestrator Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Our licensing is on a yearly basis. We pay for the license and then we pay the support every year."
  • "This solution is expensive and the licensing is more attractive for Haveri."
  • "The price is reasonable, and one of the reasons that this product was selected."
  • "We provide the VMware solution to our clients, for which they pay a perpetual license."
  • "The concept of hyper-convergence is smart. I don't know if it can be applied with less cost to be more affordable for small or medium-sized companies. The cost is a very important factor for it. We are currently depending on SAN storage. However, the hyper-converged solutions are depending on the storage within the hosts, such as vSAN in the VMware. It is a smart solution."
  • "We pay a yearly fee, based on our entries."
  • "The licensing module is somewhat complex. Calculating the cost is complicated. Many of our clients are unclear about the billing system and the traffic metering."
  • "The licensing cost is manageable because they have different versions available, standard, essential, and advanced."
  • More vCenter Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Technical support has been good.
    Top Answer:I am familiar with the pricing and would describe it as fair. It's not too expensive.
    Top Answer:While there is always room for improvement, I cannot speak to an exact feature or aspect. I'm fairly new to the solution and need to explore it further.
    Top Answer:The stability of the product is very good.
    Top Answer:My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product.
    Top Answer:There are some update-related issues with the product. The tool's updates are released on time, so there was continuous improvement from vCenter's end. The product also has an extended community and… more »
    Ranking
    30th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    278
    Comparisons
    147
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    447
    Rating
    8.0
    9th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    312
    Comparisons
    259
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    SkyKick is a new kind of migration application that makes it fast, safe, and easy to move small and medium businesses to Office 365. SkyKick’s Application Suite is a cloud based solution consisting of three products that work together to help plan, move, and setup the migration to Office 365.

    VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.
    Sample Customers
    Arterian
    Beiersdorf Shared Services
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SkyKick Cloud Manager is ranked 30th in Cloud Management with 1 review while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. SkyKick Cloud Manager is rated 8.0, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SkyKick Cloud Manager writes "Robust, reasonably priced, and offers good features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". SkyKick Cloud Manager is most compared with CloudSphere, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.