We performed a comparison between Skybox Security Suite and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Skybox allows organizations to reprioritize the vulnerability they attempt to patch and mitigate, based on the contextual awareness of the network."
"The way that it's built with three-tier architecture, it makes it very horizontally scalable, so I can have multiple fallbacks. If one machine does fall offline, there are four other machines that are doing the exact same job to pick it up"
"It's very supportive and very user-friendly."
"It's given us more visibility in terms of what are the kinds of configurations that are on these devices, and how many of these are stale rules. So it's helped greatly in terms of cleaning up of rules, for sure. And it has definitely given us a more secure way of backing up the configuration on these devices."
"I am impressed with the tool's change management, firewall and network assurance."
"The solution's simplicity of use is its most valuable feature."
"The port division management was the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"Security review is the most important feature, because it offers a single pane of glass to analyze multiple firewalls."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The interface is fine."
"The product is easy to use."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"The solution creates vulnerability tickets within the VM profile but should also include them under the Remediation tab so the fixes can be viewed in the ticketing queue."
"The solution was quite technical. It would be easier to manage if the solution was more specific about aspects of the solution and provided more advisory around how to use it effectively. It would help users a lot if they were more clear about everything."
"The solution does not support certain devices or vendors in some regions or countries due to regulations."
"If anything could be improved it would be staying on top of the collector scripts, but I understand that's a very tough challenge."
"The support could be improved."
"Skybox Security Suite's attack surface management feature needs improvement."
"The only place where Skybox has room for improvement, and they're working on releasing this, it's just a slow-go, is the UI. The user interface has historically been via a locally installed thick client. They are moving to a web-based console and it's slowly coming out."
"The cloud site could be better. They should provide some use cases to help users."
"During implementation, we realised approximately 30 devices were not supported by the Skybox platform."
"The solution must be promoted more in the market."
"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."
"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."
"The stability has room for improvement."
"Users get confused between VPR and CVSS ratings."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."
"The solution is a bit slow."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Skybox Security Suite is ranked 18th in Vulnerability Management with 34 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and RedSeal, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our Skybox Security Suite vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
