We performed a comparison between SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."
"When Intel acquired McAfee they worked on the protocol so that all vendors can work on the same platform. It's a very big improvement in McAfee. All McAfee products talk to each other. Other vendor's products can join this platform as well so it makes it more powerful on the enterprise side for McAfee."
"We really like the dashboard from Trellix and we've found that it's pretty informative."
"Initially, the DLP was very valuable for disabling access to USB drives."
"Would benefit with the addition of DLP features."
"The most valuable feature is ease of use."
"It also allows multifunctionality within a single platform."
"The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable."
"The most valuable features are the prevention layer that detects the signature value and prevents threats in the network."
"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."
"The solution could provide open XDR in addition to EDR."
"Although they have increased the complexity, it has affected the scanning speed."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"On the next release, they should build an easier way to see a repair option within the McAfee icon on your system tray. If there was an issue, you should be able to contact the user or just right-click on "repair". That would be a very good feature to add. That could be a place of improvement, just adding that button, or customizing it."
"We experienced some bad behavior when we first installed the product. The system also starts slowly in some instances. If for some reason this solution crashes, we could lose all our data."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"It would be a lot easier if I could add multiple user accounts within a single device."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is ranked 20th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is rated 10.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform writes "Advanced vulnerability Management solution with out-of-the-box integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, BigFix and NinjaOne, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.