We performed a comparison between Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."OpenAPI supported me integrating Oracle Warehouse Builder with DevOps solutions like versioning (CVS, Subversion, and Git), ticket systems (Bugzilla and Jira), and test automatization (HPQC) as well as with professional ALM solutions (HP ALM and IKAN ALM)."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"Unfortunately, a next release of Oracle Warehouse Builder will not happen but a wide range of customers still use the available features together with the current Oracle 11g or 12c database environments."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
More Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] writes "Can be enhanced with extra functionality, but no further support will be given for the solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
