We performed a comparison between Oracle Network Cloud Service and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."The initial setup was straightforward."
"The solution adds great value to any organization."
"The internal integration within departments and integration with third parties is simplified in the system."
"I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten because it covers all the fields, has a big maturity, and has something other solutions are missing, which is speed."
"It is indeed a stable solution, but it depends on how you architecture the component in AWS. If the component has the right architecture and is properly provisioned and placed, then it will be a stable platform."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is the latency and speed. When we use the various typical relation database, the performance was visible."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA is Fiori. It allows users to access information quickly and easily, without having to navigate through unnecessary screens or transactions. Additionally, the ability to retrieve data more efficiently is helpful. Furthermore, the pre-delivered videos and functionalities within the solution allow for easier application building."
"SAP S4HANA's most valuable features include backup, security, storage, infrastructure, and enabling AI."
"Technical support is very good from SAP and AWS...Scalability is always available in the solution...With a stable environment, it should be running very nicely."
"Most of the customers complain about the network communicating with the Cloud."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having more data centers because there are limited data centers in the region I am in. Amazon AWS has announced a few more data centers to be added, but they're still not 100 percent operational for SAP solutions."
"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."
"The tool should undergo an overall improvement, including support. Data sharing should also be faster."
"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."
"The pricing is a little bit high."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"The product can be very complex."
"I would like for them to have more integration with virtualization platforms."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Network Cloud Service is ranked 43rd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Oracle Network Cloud Service is rated 10.0, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Network Cloud Service writes "Excellent support but it is a costly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Oracle Network Cloud Service is most compared with , whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon AWS.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
