OpenText Service Manager [EOL] vs Serviceaide ChangeGear comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
1,329 views|899 comparisons
79% willing to recommend
Serviceaide Logo
263 views|187 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Service Manager [EOL] and Serviceaide ChangeGear based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in Help Desk Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Help Desk Software Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"A valuable feature for us is that we have an ordered way to handle all the cases that we can handle with the infrastructure.""Service Manager gives us a single system where everything is centralized in one base.""We can have all our requests and incidents registered in one system.""It's easy to scale.""The design has been revamped in terms of GUI. The current interface is quite easy to read.""The workflow engine that standardizes and globalizes the process steps. It drives people through the process by standardization and automation.""The initial setup is easy.""It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Pros →

"The solution is a highly mature product. Because of this, it can stand up to any other product on the market."

More Serviceaide ChangeGear Pros →

Cons
"The solution does not interface well with other products and is difficult to implement.""Customization can be difficult at times because scripting is often required.""There should be some front desk provided or some options to let our users serve themselves, because we have about 5000 servers and 400 applications.""We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system.""The greatest issue for us is to understand the roadmap. We want to know whether we should upgrade now or should we wait three months.""I think the best recommendation to Micro Focus would be to increase awareness and the marketing for this product.""I don't see anything lacking.""I think one area which is the most painful from my point of view is if you need to integrate a lot of the tools, and being able to make that a lot more seamless."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Cons →

"The solution needs to improve its reporting features. The user interface needs a lot of improvements."

More Serviceaide ChangeGear Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."
  • "Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."
  • "The license is not cheap."
  • "I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."
  • "HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."
  • More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's technical support services need improvement.
    Top Answer:We use the product for infrastructure, profile, and incident management.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    17th
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    1,329
    Comparisons
    899
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    7.0
    31st
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    263
    Comparisons
    187
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager
    Serviceaide ISM (Intelligent Service Management), Nimsoft Service Desk, CA Cloud Service Management , ChangeGear
    Learn More
    Overview

    Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

    ChangeGear, a leader in the GigaOm ITSM Radar Report, presents a cutting-edge AI-based service management platform that transforms user experience and enhances decision-making. Offering a business-friendly interface, ChangeGear is customizable with drag-n-drop editing, ensuring adaptability to diverse user needs. The AI-driven platform accelerates decision-making processes with real-time recommendations and intelligent predictions, boosting staff efficiency. Advanced automation, including workflow automation and business process automation, streamlines operations, freeing staff from manual tasks. Recognized for its agility and speed, ChangeGear stands out in change management, asset management, and service desk solutions. For industries navigating compliance challenges, ChangeGear's robust change management and auditing capabilities provide a comprehensive solution. 

    Sample Customers
    resultspositive, Globicon
    Oakwood Systems Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Healthcare Company25%
    Educational Organization13%
    Media Company13%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Help Desk Software
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in Help Desk Software. Updated: May 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is ranked 17th in Help Desk Software with 48 reviews while Serviceaide ChangeGear is ranked 31st in Help Desk Software. OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while Serviceaide ChangeGear is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Service Manager [EOL] writes "A solution that works out of the box. The solution's real strength is its ability to change for your organization's infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Serviceaide ChangeGear writes "Reduced the Service Desk effectiveness compared to the product we were using". OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) and BMC Helix ITSM, whereas Serviceaide ChangeGear is most compared with ServiceNow and Zoho Desk.

    See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors and best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

    We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.