Ubuntu Linux vs Windows Server vs openSUSE Leap comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
openSUSE Logo
8,730 views|7,235 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Canonical Logo
35,897 views|32,560 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
19,557 views|14,825 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between openSUSE Leap, Ubuntu Linux, and Windows Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Canonical, Oracle and others in Operating Systems (OS) for Business.
To learn more, read our detailed Operating Systems (OS) for Business Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature by far has been the virtualization capabilities of the operating system.""I use openSUSE Leap as the base for the Kubernetes cluster we run in-house.""The solution is easy for me to use because the backend is derived from FreeBSD and this is something I have been using for over 20 years.""The solution is very stable after it is configured. It is hard to have a panel slow, a problem, misconfiguration, or any kind of loss function.""openSUSE Leap has helped me with using containers in Podman.""Stable - it just runs without the necessity to reboot."

More openSUSE Leap Pros →

"The initial setup is simple.""The most valuable feature of this solution is that Linux has cost-effective licenses.""I like this product much better than some other similar solutions.""The solution is scalable.""The initial setup is simple.""I think Ubuntu's main strength, as opposed to using the other Linuxes, has been its ability to encourage user feedback.""For us, OpenStack is awesome. We want something that will be much simpler than a broad and complicated solution.""I like its computation speed compared to Windows and other similar features."

More Ubuntu Linux Pros →

"Windows Server is most commonly used and practiced.""It's important to us that it is easy to use and has easy maintenance because we don't have specialists""The main feature of the solution is it has a graphical interface.""Setting up Windows Server is pretty straightforward. It takes anywhere from a few hours to a day. One person can do it if it's not a complex environment.""Windows Server can be used for any kind of application. It is an operating system that supports enterprise applications. There is no application that doesn't go with Windows.""I like that it's a stable product. For me, it's working fine.""The initial setup is quite straightforward.""The biggest advantage of Windows Server is the services. It offers the ability to configure services, so your application can run on a Windows Server."

More Windows Server Pros →

Cons
"In the future, the Active Directory could improve.""There is room for improvement in the console.""I would like openSUSE Leap to have better link integration with Windows.""Somehow the change from OS12.x via 13.x to Leap was a bit bumpy and some old issues seemed to reappear.""Like most Linux-based operating systems, the biggest challenge Leap faces is the GUI.""The initial system setup or network configuration of the solution is not straightforward and can be improved."

More openSUSE Leap Cons →

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly.""Ubuntu Linux could improve by having more out-of-the-box functionality for common plug-and-play devices, such as printers. It's sometimes more difficult to plug-and-play printers with Ubuntu Linux. You need to work a bit and make some drivers work. They need to work a bit on plug-and-play devices.""The config file can be changed in many ways, but with other solutions, there is only one way to configure the system.""Developing more applications for businesses could work better, but that is not part of the OS piece. Let the developers work on other apps, therefore the needs for consuming less memory do not affect the performance of this OS version.""The solution's initial setup is complex, and its technical support is not very good.""On the gaming side, things are happening but there are some games that should be ported to Ubuntu.""The solution could improve by having the user interface use fewer resources.""I find the solution could be easier to use, more flexible, user-friendly, and have a better UI."

More Ubuntu Linux Cons →

"I would like to see better integration with other operating systems.""The performance is good but we have had some issues when we use virtual machines.""There's a short availability that could be much better.""Compared to Linux, the solution is a bit difficult to deploy.""The solution's licensing cost is expensive and could be improved.""Windows Server could always be more secure.""Windows Server could be improved with cheaper licensing costs.""The solution could offer higher availability."

More Windows Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an open-source operating system that can be used free of charge."
  • "The cost of this solution was reasonable and it was within our budget."
  • "The solution is open-source."
  • "openSUSE Leap is a free and open-source solution."
  • More openSUSE Leap Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "​Old equipment works for at least two or three years more, which means a significant savings.​"
  • "I use the free version, so I don't have any license fees."
  • "It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
  • "It is not a very expensive solution."
  • "Ubuntu pricing is reasonable."
  • "It is open source, so it is free. There is no licensing fee."
  • "It is a free product."
  • "Ubuntu is an open-source Linux operating system that can be used free of charge."
  • More Ubuntu Linux Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Microsoft is relatively inexpensive compared to other database platforms."
  • "This is not an expensive product."
  • "It is an expensive product."
  • "In our case, we primarily use Microsoft, so the cost is a lot less. But some of our customers have spent approximately $12,000 a year on the operating system license."
  • "The license model needs improvement."
  • "Our current license is an enterprise license agreement which gives you a whole lot of possibility, especially when you go through an R&D process. For example, you can provision everything, spread the service use over six months, and then wrap it up. It gives you a lot of flexibility."
  • "The Windows Server standard edition is affordable."
  • "We pay yearly for a license. If you ask any vendor they will tell you that it could be cheaper."
  • More Windows Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I use openSUSE Leap as the base for the Kubernetes cluster we run in-house.
    Top Answer:The initial system setup or network configuration of the solution is not straightforward and can be improved. You have… more »
    Top Answer:I use openSUSE Leap as the base for the Kubernetes cluster we run in-house. We used the solution to set up a Kubernetes… more »
    Top Answer:Ubunto Linux is a complete Linux operating system that is freely available with both community and professional support… more »
    Top Answer: It has a good support system for loading databases.
    Top Answer:The tool supports many applications.
    Top Answer:The administration interface should be more user-friendly. Some parts of the administration interface have been… more »
    Top Answer:I used the solution for my file server, music server, and document management system.
    Ranking
    Views
    8,730
    Comparisons
    7,235
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    328
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    35,897
    Comparisons
    32,560
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    441
    Rating
    8.9
    Views
    19,557
    Comparisons
    14,825
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    343
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ubuntu
    Learn More
    Canonical
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    openSUSE Leap is a brand new way of building openSUSE and is new type of hybrid Linux distribution. Leap uses source from SUSE Linux Enterprise (SLE), which gives Leap a level of stability unmatched by other Linux distributions, and combines that with community developments to give users, developers and sysadmins the best stable Linux experience available. Contributor and enterprise efforts for Leap bridge a gap between matured packages and newer packages found in openSUSE’s other distribution Tumbleweed.

    Ubuntu Linux is an powerful, easy-to-use, customizable, free, and safe open-source operating system. Some of the world’s top tech corporations, like Intel and Microsoft, rely on Ubuntu Linux to power their operations. It is an operating system that is so trusted by the tech community that it comes pre-installed on global computer vendors like HP and Dell. It is therefore little wonder that Ubuntu Desktop is the world’s most widely-used Linux workstation platform.

    Ubuntu Linux comes in a variety of derivatives that enable organizations to select the operating system type that will best meet their needs. There are four derivative types and a number of flavors. The derivative types are:

    1. Ubuntu Desktop. As indicated by the name, this derivative is specifically designed to run on laptops and desktops. That said, it is a solution that can be and is used to power other hardware-based systems, such as servers and data centers. However, without the addition of software that primes it to serve as a server program, it only functions on desktops and, as a result, only runs applications that are meant for general use. These can include applications like web browsers and multimedia programs. Users can install it through a prompt-driven process that plays out on their graphical user interfaces.

    2. Ubuntu Server. This version of Ubuntu differs from Ubuntu Desktop in a number of ways. The first is that, as suggested by the product name, it is designed for use on an organization’s servers. It is for this reason that Ubuntu Server supports applications that are more focused on the operations of the server and the network that it runs. This differs from Ubuntu Desktop in that Desktop is basically only concerned with the device that is running it. Their methods of installation also differ, as Ubuntu Server has no graphical user interface. Instead, it is installed by way of a process-driven menu.

    3. Ubuntu Core. Ubuntu Core is a stripped-down version of Linux that is specifically designed to handle embedded device projects.

    4. Ubuntu Cloud. The designers of Ubuntu Cloud focused on providing users with a highly secure and versatile operating system that they can run on the public cloud.

    Ubuntu Linux Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Ubuntu Linux’s open-source operating system include:

    • Ease of installation and use. Ubuntu Linux is simple for beginners to install and then use. Anyone who has some knowledge of computer systems should be able to deploy Ubuntu Linux. The user interface is as simple to use as those available to users of Windows or macOS.
    • Customization. Users of Ubuntu Linux have access to many different flavors of the operating system. This enables them to customize it so that it best meets their operational needs.
    • Operational flexibility. Users can install Ubuntu Linux onto a wide variety of device types. Windows and Mackintosh computers and devices are both fully compatible with this operating system.

    Ubuntu Linux Features

    • Data security. Ubuntu Linux employs various security practices and features that enable users to safeguard their data against malware attacks.
    • Applications. Users have access to a wide variety of applications that can easily be downloaded for use on Ubuntu.

    • Hardware autoconfiguration. The hardware drivers that users need in order to configure the hardware correctly so that Ubuntu Linux can be properly installed come built -in to the Ubuntu Linux operating system.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Ubuntu Linux is an operating system that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two of its major advantages are the high level of security that it offers applications that run on it and the low level of maintenance that it actually requires system administrators to do once it has been deployed.

    Franco P., the founder and CEO of Applied Labs, writes, “When you have this relationship with Linux and you start working with very secure environments, there's less possibility of being directly attacked by a group of hackers. You will lose less data and you will have a more reliable ecosystem.”

    The principal cloud architect at a wholesaler and distributor writes, “With Ubuntu Linux, you can set it and forget it. It requires a low amount of administrative overhead.

    Windows Server is a versatile solution for various tasks, including domain control, virtualization, hosting applications, databases, managing user accounts in Active Directory, file sharing, and remote server access. It is also used for endpoint security, running ERP systems, and supporting business applications such as SAP and Microsoft Dynamics. 

    The solution is user-friendly and easy to configure and install, with technical support available. Windows Server is widely used and trusted. It has helped organizations by offering a domain controller and domain service, allowing them to sell products with Microsoft and keep processes running 24/7 without downtime.

    Reviews from Real Users

    There are a number of characteristics that make Windows Server an extremely effective solution. Two major ones are its inherent flexibility and its user-friendly nature.

    PeerSpot user Antonio D., a sales manager at INFOSEC, takes note of Windows Server 2016’s flexibility when he writes, “The product is a good operating system. The features fit our needs very well. For example, with Windows Server, you can use a machine for printing, accessing the internet, or using some applications. You can do it all with one server. You don't need several servers. One is enough.”

    Himanshu T., a system administrator and DevOps engineer at a tech-services company, takes note of the various way in which Windows Server 2016 is easy to use when he writes, “This solution is very user friendly, easy to use for any system administrator, simple to deploy applications, has a wide range of applications available, great UI, and takes less technical skills to operate than some other competitors. Additionally, the active directory has great functionality; if we want to integrate any assets, then we can easily do it.”

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Samsung, eBay, AT&T, Walmart, Cisco, Time Warner Cable, Bloomberg, Best Buy, Dell, Intel, Microsoft, Ericsson, Orange, Wells Fargo
    Rakuten, Rackspace, Tyco
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Educational Organization9%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Educational Organization9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    Educational Organization10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business49%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Operating Systems (OS) for Business
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Canonical, Oracle and others in Operating Systems (OS) for Business. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.