We performed a comparison between NGINX Plus, Oracle SOA Suite, and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."Supports IMAP, POP and SMTP protocols for the reverse proxy."
"NGINX works much better than HAProxy in our current hardware and architecture for HTTP/HTTPS load balancing. "
"Its most valuable features are load balancing and application delivery. This is the most efficient application for these features because of stability and its efficiency."
"Its versatility and capabilities make it invaluable for implementing patches and fixes when necessary."
"With NGINX, I appreciate its ability to route traffic geographically."
"The best solution, by far, for web traffic control for things in production and just around the house."
"This solution has everything."
"-"
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the option to design, and the development can happen at the same time."
"The product provides transparency in finances."
"In Oracle SOA Suite some applications are not able to use REST, but it can support both SOAP and REST. You're able to integrate quite a lot of systems, which may not be able to in other solutions. You can also use XML and JSON. It is a standardizing type of tool. It doesn't matter whether I'm using JSON or XML, it can convert them."
"The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"Provides connectivity between discrete systems and has availability."
"The ability to stand up a highly available SOA Suite, which has full DR capabilities, in a remote center and synchronize the databases using Data Guard."
"Enables our Product Manager to post products to different outside EC platforms with only one interface and one process."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."
"Improvement needed in NGINX Plus could focus on optimizing memory usage for users."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The center management system could be improved."
"The solution must improve its performance."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"I would suggest adding GUI-based configuration panels to NGINX Plus to simplify setup and management tasks."
"Our most challenging part was to run an older PHP website reverse-proxied through NGINX. That was not fun."
"Make modules easier to enable or disable. The beauty and ugly side of the NGINX modules is you have to know how to compile the module. For beginners or non-very technical aspirant(s) going for NGINX, they have to learn how to compile the modules."
"The Maven integration in JDeveloper is very basic and might be enhanced to allow the proper use of Maven."
"One area that could be better is the human task feature. It could be improved to provide more functionality and customization options because it has limited options available."
"Decrease the number of internal resources which the product uses."
"SOA"
"Various parts of SOA, BPEL, and so on, each have their own consoles which need to be accessed individually with different logins. It would be better from an admin perspective if all the consoles were accessible via a single login."
"The interface is too complicated. Making modifications still requires too much technical knowledge."
"I want to see easier integration connections with other cloud-based tools."
"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."
"The stability of the solution needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
