We performed a comparison between NetCrunch and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"The Add data feature lets you gather any type of log and easily analyze it."
"It is a great resource for us because we have so many different data sources and to be able to aggregate that and put it through a concise dashboard or an alert really helps."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the data integration."
"The most valuable feature is log reporting."
"The initial setup was straightforward. We didn't find it to be too complex."
"It can monitor, get the data, and then report on the data."
"It's a very easy-to-use solution."
"The ability to create custom dashboards is one of the best features and that's typically why most people deploy Splunk. Users can create dashboards for just about anything."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
"The clustering part of indexes can be more refined."
"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."
"The cost needs to be re-examined. It's extremely expensive to run. It's also expensive to expand. That's the number one complaint all of my customers have when it comes to Splunk. It's way too expensive compared to other solutions."
"There is a lot of room for improvement with the automation."
"This solution is difficult to configure and the instructions are complex."
"Splunk could be better integrated with configuration manager solutions so we can automatically resolve issues without human interference."
"We still use Splunk Enterprise licensing. A lot of the newer features go into Splunk Cloud before Enterprise. We're not looking to switch our licensing over, so we're falling behind on the newer features."
"The deployment can be quite complex."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
NetCrunch is ranked 67th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is ranked 13th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 23 reviews. NetCrunch is rated 8.0, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring writes "Helps to ingest a massive amount of raw data and use it effectively". NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Nagios XI, Cisco Intersight, Amazon CloudWatch and ITRS Geneos.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
