We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"I am impressed with the product's connectors and scalability."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing."
"Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"I would like for them to work in real-time."
Earn 20 points
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 7th in Business-to-Business Middleware. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse, whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
