We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Rivery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The flexibility has been great overall."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."
Earn 20 points
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while Rivery is ranked 26th in Cloud Data Integration. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Rivery is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rivery writes "Great logic and the ability to call outside API if needed. Key feature is management of different sources". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Rivery is most compared with AWS Glue, Alteryx Designer and Azure Data Factory.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
