We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."You can easily connect Power Apps with other databases, like Excel, SharePoint, SQL, etc."
"The UI functionality is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Model-driven or Canvas application-making platforms. The power of the two gives us exactly what we are looking for."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"The solution is easy to use and map."
"The solution is excellent at figuring how to build an application in three months. It makes it very quick and easy."
"For all no-code platforms that let you create a front end, you can click together something very quick."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"We're not in production yet, so we're still working through some issues."
"The solution should move to the next step in its maturity model and include mobile versions for Android and iOS."
"The flexibility of the user interface could be better."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"There are occasional performance challenges."
"The solution must provide more integration with third-party applications."
"It's sometimes hard to import groups of options. At this point, I need to enter those manually and it slows the process down."
"There is room for improvement in error handling and debugging."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and OutSystems, whereas Pillir is most compared with .
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.