We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, and Rackspace Cloud [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."It's very scalable. We can scale up to 80-85% without issues."
"Provides a high level of availability and 99% uptime."
"The pricing is quite good, and it is designed as pay-per-use."
"Good security, scalability, and elasticity."
"We are going to use Microsoft Azure to move some on-premise servers into the cloud so that our data can be held there."
"We have not had any issues with the performance, or the stability."
"The solution has proven to be quite stable so far."
"Microsoft has a lot of partners in this area, and they have a lot of information available online, so it's easy to get support."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature for us is the support, which is really efficient."
"There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services."
"Image backup is a valuable feature. Even though this is a common feature, it is very helpful for us."
"Microsoft should have one package for all their solutions in one place to be found."
"Microsoft's technical support could be improved."
"The solution could improve by providing better tutorials and documentation."
"Predictability and quality. Make sure things work predictable, as expected, and documented."
"It would be advantageous if the dashboard had more clarity, in terms of the visibility that it provides."
"The market place can be raised, and the CMT can be more sophisticated to create more opportunities for the end users."
"Specifically, I would like to see better Azure Data Analytics and monitoring RF."
"Azure could be made more user-friendly."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
"It would be nice to have more built-in suites compared to others. It would enable easier integration."
"It doesn't offer Elastic IP like AWS. And also we can't configure our server based on region."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points