We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Oracle Dyn Web Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."I like the tool's stability and performance."
"It does an excellent job of load balancing."
"WAF feature replicates the firewall."
"Azure Application Gateway's most valuable feature is ease of use. The configuration is straightforward. It isn't difficult to adjust the size of your instances in the settings. You can do that with a few clicks, and the configuration file is the same way. You can also set rules and policies with minimal time and effort."
"Some of the key features of this solution are the low-level maintenance required, floating proxy service, and load balancing."
"The solution provides great automation and it is easy to upgrade service."
"This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"The increased security that we are considering is because of some of the things that the security team has brought to our attention. They have pointed out that we would most likely require a better web application firewall than Azure Application Gateway."
"The product's performance should be better."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS."
"The working speed of the solution needs improvement."
"Scalability can be an issue."
"Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM."
"The solution has many limitations. You cannot upgrade the VPN to the application gateway. So I started with version one, which has limited capabilities, and they provided version two. And unfortunately, I cannot upgrade from v one to v two like other services. So I have to decommission the version one and create a new one with version two. Also the version one was complex with the certificates uploading the SQL certificates."
"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 3rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 50th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2, while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with AWS WAF, Azure Front Door, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
