We performed a comparison between Kinetica and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."The solution scales easily."
"The user interface is very good. You can do any kind of reporting analytics from the platform."
"The data storage requirement is reduced from the original database to the HANA database."
"The solution operates well."
"We are using the solution for the DW system. The primary function of the solution is for the database in memory."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is its performance and integration."
"We like that the product is both vertically and horizontally scalable, allowing us to do around 86 percent compression of documentation from 50 to seven terabytes."
"The memory is the solution's most valuable feature. It's the main feature of HANA. Others are still the regular IT databases that are on storage and are therefore much slower than HANA. The solution is quite fast."
"The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well."
"There are very limited resources available in the market in terms of implementation. They need to offer training plans for graduates so that more resources are available in the market."
"Needs graphical programming without coding."
"There's an issue in the partition. When you record more than two million records, partitioning does not work well. In Oracle it's easy. SAP must resolve this issue in order to be more competitive with Oracle."
"It would be nice to know when SAP plans to stop its maintenance of a previous version of SAP ECC ERP because, at this point, anyone utilizing SAP will have no choice but to go on S/4HANA Database."
"The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital."
"I don't have direct access to SAP, and instead, I need to go through the SAP office in India."
"They can improve their technology for the CRM subsystem. There are other products that are better and more effective for the CRM subsystem. Its price could be better. It is expensive."
"The SAP ERP processes are quite complex and it can be challenging."
"SAP HANA is a very proprietary tool and there's not as much support available for it as there is for an SQL Server (which is more popular)."
Kinetica is ranked 22nd in Relational Databases Tools with 1 review while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. Kinetica is rated 7.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Kinetica writes "Easy to scale and good record to report capabilities but needs better training ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Kinetica is most compared with OmniSci and SingleStore, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.