Informatica Data Integration Hub vs webMethods.io Integration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Integration Hub and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Data Integration Hub vs. webMethods.io Integration Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly.""The technical support services are good.""The MDM solution is capable of integrating multiple systems, so it helped us to solve the purpose of centralizing the depository as well as the standardization of mass data. It takes away all the ambiguity around data integrity issues or all the process challenges which happen when every stage of a process uses a different source as master data."

More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pros →

"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility.""I like the tool's scalability.""The solution is scalable.""Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature.""The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.""Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration.""It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

More webMethods.io Integration Pros →

Cons
"They could provide more robust performance for data integration processes. It would help in improving the data quality more efficiently.""When it comes to UI look and feel and user experience, Informatica is not as good as other solutions.""The initial setup was not very straightforward. Not complex, but not very simple either."

More Informatica Data Integration Hub Cons →

"It is difficult to maintain.""Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved.""The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.""webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors.""The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols.""I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier.""The solution's release management feature could be better."

More webMethods.io Integration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Comparatively, their prices are a little bit too high."
  • More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is a yearly license."
  • "webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."
  • More webMethods.io Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:They could provide more robust performance for data integration processes. It would help in improving the data quality more efficiently.
    Top Answer:Working with a healthcare client with diverse locations, we faced the challenge of analyzing data in isolation, making it difficult to generalize findings across different areas. With the help of… more »
    Top Answer:The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.
    Top Answer:The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io… more »
    Top Answer:In my company, the solution is used for SAP Integration.
    Ranking
    37th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    913
    Comparisons
    855
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    469
    Rating
    8.0
    22nd
    Views
    374
    Comparisons
    308
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Informatica Integration Hub, Integration Hub
    webMethods Integration Cloud, Software AG webMethods Integration Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Informatica Data Integration Hub empowers large organizations to embrace change and the opportunities of new applications and analytics systems, while managing storage in Hadoop as well as relational database and file store options. The centralized modern hubbased architecture is the foundation for agile and managed enterprise data integration. As the first to apply a publish/subscribe model to data integration linking big data, cloud, and traditional systems, Informatica delivers productivity and intelligent automation without compromising control.

    Software AG (Frankfurt MDAX: SOW) offers Freedom as a Service. We reimagine integration, spark business transformation and enable fast innovation on the Internet of Things so you can pioneer differentiating business models. We give you the freedom to connect and integrate any technology—from app to edge. We help you free data from silos so it’s shareable, usable and powerful—enabling you to make the best decisions and unlock entirely new possibilities for growth. Software AG has more than 4,700 employees, is active in 70 countries and had revenues of € 866 million in 2018.

    Sample Customers
    Humana, Rabobank, State of Washington
    Autosen, A1 Digital, Cintas
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Informatica Data Integration Hub vs. webMethods.io Integration
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Data Integration Hub vs. webMethods.io Integration and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Informatica Data Integration Hub is ranked 37th in Data Integration with 3 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. Informatica Data Integration Hub is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Integration Hub writes "Excellent at standardizing mass data and capable of integrating with multiple solutions ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Informatica Data Integration Hub is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, AWS Database Migration Service, Azure Data Factory, SAP Data Hub and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Informatica Data Integration Hub vs. webMethods.io Integration report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.