IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs Unitrends comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
376 views|330 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Unitrends Logo
1,347 views|959 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli CDP for Files and Unitrends based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery.
To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."

More IBM Tivoli CDP for Files Pros →

"I like the fact that you can recover the VMs inside the appliance. For example, they're basically running this appliance on a Linux-based distribution, and they're spinning off KVM virtual machines inside.""The predictive analytics are great and the reporting is awesome.""The most valuable feature of Unitrends for me is the automated feedback""Unitrends has helped us cut down the time that it takes to restore a server to its original configuration.""I am impressed with the tool's reporting and UniView features.""Stability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten.""When we talk about a backup point of view, from a backup perspective, it's a good one.""What I found most valuable in Unitrends is its simple user interface. It also works reliably."

More Unitrends Pros →

Cons
"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."

More IBM Tivoli CDP for Files Cons →

"It could be a little more customizable.""Techs don't see to be well-versed in troubleshooting issues that arise and tickets stay opened for weeks for resolution.""I would like to see more storage options for the free version.""Probably the biggest issue I've had is actually paying for the unit, and part of that problem is that they use a third party for the billing.""The solution’s UI can be improved. I am saying this because I have seen solutions with better UIs.""Comparing the features and the working pattern, definitely they have to come down on pricing if they want to compete in the market.""I would like to see the real-time replication process improved, and a zero RPO feature added.""Support is great for small simple issues, but anything more difficult, it is hard to get good resolutions without having to badger them and their management."

More Unitrends Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."
  • More IBM Tivoli CDP for Files Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Make sure you do the homework to size the solution properly. Buy the Enterprise Plus licensing if you can afford it."
  • "When you purchase initially, get into the program which gives replacement hardware for free when you renew your support agreement."
  • "Initial pricing is competitive. Renewal pricing is steep, so make sure to project costs for the lifetime of the appliance(s)."
  • "Talk with the sales guys. They can work with you on the best package."
  • "We found that the cost of Unitrends was about the same as the Dell DR6300. We liked the fact that the Unitrends appliance was all-in-one."
  • "The cost of Unitrends definitely draws you in. The licensing is all included in the appliance, which is a great incentive."
  • "Pricing model constantly changes."
  • "You should be aware how much the monthly costs are to use, what the initial costs for hardware are, and what the options to expand are, if needed."
  • More Unitrends Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Unitrends for me is the automated feedback
    Top Answer:Unitrends is an expensive solution. We've negotiated deals where they've given us the $ 62,000 to $ 64,000 appliance for free but charged $ 90,000 for three years of support.
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, the UI, especially in the recovery section, is unclear about which repository it uses—I had to hover over to find that information. Figuring out the scripting part wasn't… more »
    Ranking
    63rd
    out of 133 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    376
    Comparisons
    330
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    44th
    out of 133 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    1,347
    Comparisons
    959
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    697
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli CDP for Files
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Continuous Data Protection for Files is a continuous backup software that protects your most important files. This real-time, continuous data protection solution for file servers and user endpoints automatically backs up your most critical files the moment they are saved.
    Unitrends increases uptime, productivity and confidence in a world in which IT professionals must do more with less. Unitrends leverages high-availability hardware and software engineering, cloud economics, enterprise power with consumer-grade design, and customer-obsessed support to natively provide all-in-one enterprise backup and continuity. The result is a “one throat to choke” set of offerings that allow our customers to focus on their business rather than backup.
    Sample Customers
    Cyberian Data Protection
    NHL Players Association, Salvation Army, Sligro Food Group, Mason General Hospital, Tec Group, Saldab IT, Baker Tilly, Clinton Savings Bank, Ennit Magna Bank, Manukau Institute of Technology
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Educational Organization8%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Wireless Company11%
    Government11%
    Non Tech Company11%
    Wellness & Fitness Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government11%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise44%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Backup and Recovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 63rd in Backup and Recovery while Unitrends is ranked 44th in Backup and Recovery with 34 reviews. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 9.0, while Unitrends is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files writes "Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unitrends writes "The solution can be used to back up servers and Hyper-V cluster nodes, but its support is super expensive". IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with Commvault Cloud, Arcserve UDP and IBM Spectrum Protect, whereas Unitrends is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect, Commvault Cloud and Arcserve UDP.

    See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

    We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.