IBM Case Foundation vs Informatica Cloud API and App Integration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and Informatica Cloud API and App Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Case Foundation vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It provides us the capability of producing b​​usiness processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository.""Case Foundation provides a strong security boost.""The content management is great.""Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great.""It's very easy.""The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it.""The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable.""The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros →

"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication.""The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs.""The interface is really good.""The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."

More Informatica Cloud API and App Integration Pros →

Cons
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic.""The cloud version could use more stability.""The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility.""90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly.""There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer""​The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications.​""There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings.""The solution can be quite expensive."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons →

"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud.""The pricing model is problematic.""There could be a lot more application integration.""The setup is complex."

More Informatica Cloud API and App Integration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
  • "This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
  • "IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
  • "The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."
  • More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.
    Top Answer:The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either. I would rate it five out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's… more »
    Top Answer:Comparatively, other services are providing a lower price, but since moving from Informatica on-prem to IICS, the pricing factor is much better. So when we compare two platforms of the same vendor… more »
    Top Answer:There are a few improvements which can be done. So those are on data governance and making an image of each object that is being created on top of Informatica, I mean, on top of applications. So those… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    499
    Comparisons
    401
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    536
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    1,309
    Comparisons
    1,094
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    636
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
    Cloud Application Integration, Cloud Application Integration, Cloud Extend, Informatica API and Application Integration
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

    Informatica Cloud’s Application Integration solution creates business processes that accelerate business response times, dramatically increase business efficiency and improves user effectiveness - all without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    Suncorp Group Limited
    Carbonite, Education Elements
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government16%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Case Foundation vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Case Foundation vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8, while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Appian, Pega BPM, ARIS Cloud and Camunda. See our IBM Case Foundation vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.